» Articles » PMID: 32203698

Pemigatinib for Previously Treated, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Multicentre, Open-label, Phase 2 Study

Abstract

Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3. This study evaluated the safety and antitumour activity of pemigatinib in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements.

Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, multicohort, phase 2 study (FIGHT-202), patients aged 18 years or older with disease progression following at least one previous treatment and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 recruited from 146 academic or community-based sites in the USA, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia were assigned to one of three cohorts: patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, patients with other FGF/FGFR alterations, or patients with no FGF/FGFR alterations. All enrolled patients received a starting dose of 13·5 mg oral pemigatinib once daily (21-day cycle; 2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or physician decision. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response among those with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, assessed centrally in all patients who received at least one dose of pemigatinib. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924376, and enrolment is completed.

Findings: Between Jan 17, 2017, and March 22, 2019, 146 patients were enrolled: 107 with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, 20 with other FGF/FGFR alterations, 18 with no FGF/FGFR alterations, and one with an undetermined FGF/FGFR alteration. The median follow-up was 17·8 months (IQR 11·6-21·3). 38 (35·5% [95% CI 26·5-45·4]) patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements achieved an objective response (three complete responses and 35 partial responses). Overall, hyperphosphataemia was the most common all-grade adverse event irrespective of cause (88 [60%] of 146 patients). 93 (64%) patients had a grade 3 or worse adverse event (irrespective of cause); the most frequent were hypophosphataemia (18 [12%]), arthralgia (nine [6%]), stomatitis (eight [5%]), hyponatraemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (seven [5%]), and fatigue (seven [5%]). 65 (45%) patients had serious adverse events; the most frequent were abdominal pain (seven [5%]), pyrexia (seven [5%]), cholangitis (five [3%]), and pleural effusion (five [3%]). Overall, 71 (49%) patients died during the study, most frequently because of disease progression (61 [42%]); no deaths were deemed to be treatment related.

Interpretation: These data support the therapeutic potential of pemigatinib in previously treated patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements.

Funding: Incyte Corporation.

Citing Articles

Tumour-agnostic kinase inhibitors.

Adashek J, Nikanjam M, Kurzrock R Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025; .

PMID: 40050521 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-025-01147-y.


Liquid biopsy in gallbladder carcinoma: Current evidence and future prospective.

Mishra S, Kumari S, Husain N J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 6:100280.

PMID: 40027313 PMC: 11863890. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100280.


Molecular Tumor Board-Guided Targeted Treatments for Biliary Tract Cancers in a Publicly Funded Healthcare System.

Beaudry F, Li Z, Borgida A, Zorigtbaatar A, Wang X, Hildebrand M Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(2).

PMID: 39996880 PMC: 11854319. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32020080.


Preparation and Characterization of an Engineered FGF1 Conjugated to Tb for Targeting of FGFRs.

Song L, Kostas M, Laerdahl J, Skalova M, Janska T, Juzeniene A ACS Omega. 2025; 10(6):5730-5743.

PMID: 39989790 PMC: 11840634. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09179.


HER2 Pathway in Biliary Tract Cancer: A Snapshot of the Current Understanding and Future Directions.

Camera S, Rossari F, Foti S, Vitiello F, Persano M, Prinzi F Target Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39985696 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-025-01132-w.


References
1.
Babina I, Turner N . Advances and challenges in targeting FGFR signalling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017; 17(5):318-332. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2017.8. View

2.
Javle M, Lowery M, Shroff R, Weiss K, Springfeld C, Borad M . Phase II Study of BGJ398 in Patients With FGFR-Altered Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 36(3):276-282. PMC: 6075847. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5009. View

3.
Kemeny N, Daly J, Oderman P, Shike M, Chun H, Petroni G . Hepatic artery pump infusion: toxicity and results in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1984; 2(6):595-600. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.6.595. View

4.
Pellino A, Loupakis F, Cadamuro M, Dadduzio V, Fassan M, Guido M . Precision medicine in cholangiocarcinoma. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3:40. PMC: 6087799. DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.07.02. View

5.
Jarnagin W, Schwartz L, Gultekin D, Gonen M, Haviland D, Shia J . Regional chemotherapy for unresectable primary liver cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial and assessment of DCE-MRI as a biomarker of survival. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20(9):1589-1595. PMC: 2731015. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp029. View