» Articles » PMID: 32201172

A Systematic Review of Interventions for Family Caregivers Who Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer at Home

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2020 Mar 24
PMID 32201172
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the characteristics of interventions to support family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: Five databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for English language articles of intervention studies utilizing randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs, reporting caregiver-related outcomes of interventions for family caregivers caring for patients with advanced cancer at home.

Results: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Based on these studies, the types of interventions were categorized into psychosocial, educational, or both. The characteristics of interventions varied. Most interventions demonstrated statistically significant results of reducing psychological distress and caregiving burden and improving quality of life, self-efficacy, and competence for caregiving. However, there was inconsistency in the use of measures.

Conclusions: Most studies showed positive effects of the interventions on caregiver-specific outcomes, yet direct comparisons of the effectiveness were limited. There is a lack of research aimed to support family caregivers' physical health.

Practice Implications: Given caregivers' needs to maintain their wellbeing and the positive effects of support for them, research examining long-term efficacy of interventions and measuring objective health outcomes with rigorous quality of studies is still needed for better outcomes for family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer.

Citing Articles

Effects of a perioperative support program on reducing psychological distress for family caregivers of patients with early-stage lung cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Zhu S, Yang C, Bai Y, Kang L, Li T, Yang X BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):220.

PMID: 40011924 PMC: 11863407. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02857-9.


Development and validation of the respite care model for adults with cancer in Iran: study protocol for a multimethod research project.

Kheibar N, Pakpour V, Rahmani A, Rassouli M, Sadeghi-Ghyassi F BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e089349.

PMID: 39920068 PMC: 11808886. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089349.


Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Caregiving Contributions During Cancer Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Cerutti J, Lent M, Holcombe R, Reblin M Cancer Med. 2025; 14(1):e70488.

PMID: 39781576 PMC: 11712184. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70488.


Effectiveness of interventions for informal caregivers of people with end-stage chronic illness: a systematic review.

McGuigan K, Laurente G, Christie A, Carswell C, Moran C, Yaqoob M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):245.

PMID: 39342397 PMC: 11438131. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02641-x.


Psychological challenges of female caregivers in providing home-based palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A descriptive-exploratory study.

Monemian S, Sharbafchi M, Taleghani F J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:30.

PMID: 38545314 PMC: 10967935. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1636_22.


References
1.
Rodgers W, Markland D, Selzler A, Murray T, Wilson P . Distinguishing perceived competence and self-efficacy: an example from exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014; 85(4):527-39. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2014.961050. View

2.
Kehoe L, Xu H, Duberstein P, Loh K, Culakova E, Canin B . Quality of Life of Caregivers of Older Patients with Advanced Cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67(5):969-977. PMC: 7818364. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15862. View

3.
Hudson P, Trauer T, Kelly B, OConnor M, Thomas K, Zordan R . Reducing the psychological distress of family caregivers of home based palliative care patients: longer term effects from a randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2014; 24(1):19-24. PMC: 4309500. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3610. View

4.
Hudson P . Improving support for family carers: key implications for research, policy and practice. Palliat Med. 2013; 27(7):581-2. DOI: 10.1177/0269216313488855. View

5.
Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A . The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5928. PMC: 3196245. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. View