Proportion of High-Risk/Very High-Risk Patients in Europe with Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Target According to European Guidelines: A Systematic Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Assess achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines.
Design: Systematic literature review.
Data Sources: Medline, EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
Eligibility Criteria: Observational studies reporting LDL-C levels/target attainment, measured between 1 August 2006 to 31 August 2017, in European adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes with target organ damage, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or 10-year risk of fatal CVD ≥ 5% (assessed by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE]).
Data Extraction And Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted relevant studies and assessed study quality using the Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 2011/2016 ESC/EAS guidelines. Where available, patient characteristics were presented as means weighted by sample size. The proportions of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 5 years before and after publication of the 2011 guidelines were compared using a chi-square test.
Results: Across 81 eligible studies (303,534 patients), achievement of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L was poor among patients with established CVD (16%; range 9-56%) and at very high risk of CVD (SCORE ≥ 10% [18%; 14-25%]). In individuals with FH, SCORE 5-10%, or diabetes and target organ damage, LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved by 15% (9-22%), 46% (21-55%) and 13% (6-34%), respectively. Comparing the 5 years before/after publication of the 2011 guidelines, target achievement increased significantly over time but remained suboptimal (LDL-C < 1.8, 22% versus 15%; LDL-C < 2.5, 68% versus 61%; both p < 0.001; established CVD group only).
Conclusions: These data show suboptimal LDL-C control among European patients at high risk of CVD. Those at greatest overall risk (clinically established CVD or at least a 10% 10-year risk of fatal CVD) had the lowest achievement of 2011/2016 EAS/ESC LDL-C targets. With lower LDL-C targets advocated in 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, this unmet need will increase.
Protocol Registration: PROSPERO registration number; CRD77844.
Elhiny R, OKeeffe L, Bodunde E, Byrne S, Donovan M, Bermingham M Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025; 24:200364.
PMID: 39877073 PMC: 11773485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200364.
Faggiano A, Gualeni A, Barbieri L, Mureddu G, Venturini E, Giallauria F J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).
PMID: 39860503 PMC: 11765577. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020493.
Arsyad D, Qalby N, Qanitha A, Mappangara I, Milayanti W, Wahiduddin J Eval Clin Pract. 2025; 31(1):e14311.
PMID: 39803729 PMC: 11726404. DOI: 10.1111/jep.14311.
Muck M, Fischer M, Hamerle M, Strack C, Holzhaeuer M, Pfeffer D Biol Sex Differ. 2024; 15(1):67.
PMID: 39223591 PMC: 11367976. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-024-00642-y.
Miya A, Nakamura A, Suzuki Y, Nomoto H, Kameda H, Cho K Diabetol Int. 2024; 15(3):465-473.
PMID: 39101195 PMC: 11291843. DOI: 10.1007/s13340-024-00712-x.