» Articles » PMID: 32195963

Risk Factors of Cage Nonunion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Mar 21
PMID 32195963
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of our study was to explore risk factors of cage nonunion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).295 patients underwent ACDF in our hospital between Jan. 2014 and Jan. 2017. Of them, 277 patients suffered cage union (union group, UG) after 6-month follow-up and 18 did not (nonunion group, NG). We collected possible factors including gender, history of smoking, alcohol, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, body mass index, diagnose, and preoperative visual analog scale -neck, visual analog scale-arm, neck disability index (NDI) and Japanese Orthorpaedic Association, surgical duration, blood loss, fusion levels, superior fusion segment, angle of C2-C7, range of motion for C2-C7, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope. We performed univariable and multivariable analysis to compare data in 2 groups.The rate of cage nonunion after ACDF was 6.1% (18 of 295) in our study. The outcome of univariable analysis showed that age (63.5 ± 10.1), angle of C2-C7 (18.0 ± 4.6), range of motion of C2-C7 (32.5 ± 7.7), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (17.9 ± 4.3) and T1 slope (22.1 ± 5.3) were higher in NG than these (59.4 ± 9.2, 16.2 ± 4.5, 30.2 ± 6.9,16.1 ± 4.0, 20.9 ± 4.9) in UG. Additionally, patients with osteoporosis had markedly higher rate of cage nonunion after ACDF than those without. What's more, the multivariable analysis implied the same results with univariable analysis.Many factors could predict cage nonunion after ACDF. Cervical sagittal parameters play an important role in cage nonunion after ACDF. We hope that we can provide some guidance for spine surgeon before performing ACDF.

Citing Articles

Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Cervical Spine Fusion in Patients with Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

Lansford T, Campbell P, Hassanzadeh H, Weinstein M, Wind J, Beaumont A Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024; 16:122534.

PMID: 39698480 PMC: 11655132. DOI: 10.52965/001c.122534.


Impact of surgical risk factors for non-union on lumbar spinal fusion outcomes using cellular bone allograft at 24-months follow-up.

Russo A, Park D, Lansford T, Nunley P, Peppers T, Wind J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):351.

PMID: 38702654 PMC: 11067233. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07456-4.


Factors Associated With Nonunion After Cervical Fusion Surgery.

Inose H, Takahashi T, Matsukura Y, Hashimoto J, Utagawa K, Egawa S Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e50866.

PMID: 38249174 PMC: 10799207. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50866.


Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Osteoporosis on Fusion Rates and Complications Following Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Pathology.

Lechtholz-Zey E, Ayad M, Gettleman B, Mills E, Shelby H, Ton A Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(3):277-286.

PMID: 38216297 PMC: 11535765. DOI: 10.14444/8568.


Longer Screws Decrease the Risk of Radiographic Pseudarthrosis Following Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Chanbour H, Bendfeldt G, Johnson G, Peterson K, Ahluwalia R, Younus I Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):858-866.

PMID: 37950628 PMC: 11877588. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231214361.


References
1.
Roguski M, Benzel E, Curran J, Magge S, Bisson E, Krishnaney A . Postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance negatively affects outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(25):2070-7. PMC: 4254605. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000641. View

2.
Fehlings M, Gray R . Importance of sagittal balance in determining the outcome of anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 11(5):518-9. DOI: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE09182. View

3.
Wang X, Chen D, Yuan W, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Zhao J . Anterior surgery in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine: technical note. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(2):314-21. PMC: 3265583. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1996-y. View

4.
Hacker R . A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93(2 Suppl):222-6. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0222. View

5.
Tang J, Scheer J, Smith J, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart R . The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(3):662-9. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9. View