» Articles » PMID: 32192969

Patterns and Predictions of Drinking Water Nitrate Violations Across the Conterminous United States

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 21
PMID 32192969
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Excess nitrate in drinking water is a human health concern, especially for young children. Public drinking water systems in violation of the 10 mg nitrate-N/L maximum contaminant level (MCL) must be reported in EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). We used SDWIS data with random forest modeling to examine the drivers of nitrate violations across the conterminous U.S. and to predict where public water systems are at risk of exceeding the nitrate MCL. As explanatory variables, we used land cover, nitrogen inputs, soil/hydrogeology, and climate variables. While we looked at the role of nitrate treatment in separate analyses, we did not include treatment as a factor in the final models, due to incomplete information in SDWIS. For groundwater (GW) systems, a classification model correctly classified 79% of catchments in violation and a regression model explained 43% of the variation in nitrate concentrations above the MCL. The most important variables in the GW classification model were % cropland, agricultural drainage, irrigation-to-precipitation ratio, nitrogen surplus, and surplus precipitation. Regions predicted to have risk for nitrate violations in GW were the Central California Valley, parts of Washington, Idaho, the Great Plains, Piedmont of Pennsylvania and Coastal Plains of Delaware, and regions of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota. For surface water (SW) systems, a classification model correctly classified 90% of catchments and a regression model explained 52% of the variation in nitrate concentration. The variables most important for the SW classification model were largely hydroclimatic variables including surplus precipitation, irrigation-to-precipitation ratio, and % shrubland. Areas at greatest risk for SW nitrate violations were generally in the non-mountainous west and southwest. Identifying the areas with possible risk for future violations and potential drivers of nitrate violations across U.S. can inform decisions on how source water protection and other management options could best protect drinking water.

Citing Articles

Vadose zone flushing of fertilizer tracked by isotopes of water and nitrate.

Weitzman J, Brooks J, Compton J, Faulkner B, Peachey R, Rugh W Vadose Zone J. 2024; 23(3):e20324.

PMID: 39678672 PMC: 11636160. DOI: 10.1002/vzj2.20324.


Nutrient Explorer: An analytical framework to visualize and investigate drivers of surface water quality.

Pennino M, Fry M, Sabo R, Carleton J Environ Model Softw. 2024; 170.

PMID: 39430121 PMC: 11485643. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105853.


Predicting Redox Conditions in Groundwater at a National Scale Using Random Forest Classification.

Tesoriero A, Wherry S, Dupuy D, Johnson T Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(11):5079-5092.

PMID: 38451152 PMC: 10956438. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07576.


Prioritizing river basins for nutrient studies.

Tesoriero A, Robertson D, Green C, Bohlke J, Harvey J, Qi S Environ Monit Assess. 2024; 196(3):248.

PMID: 38332337 PMC: 10853301. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-12266-7.


Our national nutrient reduction needs: Applying a conservation prioritization framework to US agricultural lands.

Kirk L, Compton J, Neale A, Sabo R, Christensen J J Environ Manage. 2023; 351:119758.

PMID: 38086118 PMC: 10851882. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119758.


References
1.
Bellmore R, Compton J, Brooks J, Fox E, Hill R, Sobota D . Nitrogen inputs drive nitrogen concentrations in U.S. streams and rivers during summer low flow conditions. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 639:1349-1359. PMC: 6361169. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.008. View

2.
Nolan B, Hitt K, Ruddy B . Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(10):2138-45. DOI: 10.1021/es0113854. View

3.
Thornbrugh D, Leibowitz S, Hill R, Weber M, Johnson Z, Olsen A . Mapping watershed integrity for the conterminous United States. Ecol Indic. 2018; 85:1133-1148. PMC: 5884453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.070. View

4.
Wheeler D, Nolan B, Flory A, DellaValle C, Ward M . Modeling groundwater nitrate concentrations in private wells in Iowa. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 536:481-488. PMC: 6397646. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.080. View

5.
Nolan B, Gronberg J, Faunt C, Eberts S, Belitz K . Modeling nitrate at domestic and public-supply well depths in the Central Valley, California. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(10):5643-51. DOI: 10.1021/es405452q. View