» Articles » PMID: 32191769

Guidance and Surroundings Awareness in Outdoor Handheld Augmented Reality

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Mar 20
PMID 32191769
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Handheld and wearable devices are becoming ubiquitous in our lives and augmented reality technology is stepping out of the laboratory environment and becoming ready to be used by anyone with portable devices. The success of augmented reality applications for pedestrians depends on different factors including a reliable guidance system and preventing risks. We show that different guidance systems can be supplementary to provide directions to a point of interest and offer clues that help the user find the augmented data when they get close to the location they have to visit. We tested the helpfulness of a map with the points of interest, an image preview of the next point of interest to visit, and an arrow showing the direction to it. The results show that the effectiveness of these guidance systems depend on the distance to the point of interest and the accuracy of the data obtained from the Global Positioning System. We also measured the total time that participants spent looking at the screen, as well as the perceived elapsed time as a measurement of real world dissociation. Finally, we discuss preliminary results to minimize the risk of accidents when using augmented reality applications in an outdoor urban environment.

References
1.
Thompson L, Rivara F, Ayyagari R, Ebel B . Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study. Inj Prev. 2012; 19(4):232-7. PMC: 3717764. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601. View

2.
Hatfield J, Murphy S . The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections. Accid Anal Prev. 2006; 39(1):197-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001. View

3.
Stavrinos D, Byington K, Schwebel D . Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians. J Safety Res. 2011; 42(2):101-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.004. View

4.
Neider M, McCarley J, Crowell J, Kaczmarski H, Kramer A . Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(2):589-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.004. View

5.
Stavrinos D, Byington K, Schwebel D . Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):e179-85. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-1382. View