Children's Beliefs About Causes of Human Characteristics: Genes, Environment, or Choice?

Overview

Journal J Exp Psychol Gen

Specialty Psychology

Date 2020 Mar 20

PMID 32191083

Citations 4

Authors

Meredith Meyer

Steven O Roberts

Toby E Jayaratne

Susan A Gelman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

To what extent do our genes make us nice, smart, or athletic? The explanatory frameworks we employ have broad consequences for how we evaluate and interact with others. Yet to date, little is known regarding when and how young children appeal to genetic explanations to understand human difference. The current study examined children's (aged 7-13 years) and adults' explanations for a set of human characteristics, contrasting genetic attributions with environmental and choice-based attributions. Whereas most adults and older children offered an unprompted genetic explanation at least once on an open-ended task, such explanations were not seen from younger children. However, even younger children, once trained on the mechanism of genes, endorsed genetic explanations for a range of characteristics-often in combination with environment and choice. Moreover, only adults favored genetic explanations for intelligence and athleticism; children, in contrast, favored environment and choice explanations for these characteristics. These findings suggest that children can employ genetic explanations in principled ways as early as 7 years of age but also that such explanations are used to account for a wider range of features by adults. Our study provides some of the first evidence regarding the ways in which genetic attributions emerge and change starting in early childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Do Children Think it is Important to Predict Learning and Behaviour Problems, and Do They Think Genetic Screening Has a Role to Play in This?.

Fields D, Asbury K J Autism Dev Disord. 2023; 54(6):2368-2385.

PMID: 37022575 PMC: 11143042. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-05966-z.

Genetic essentialist beliefs about criminality predict harshness of recommended punishment.

Meyer M, Dolins F, Grijalva Y, Gelman S J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022; 151(12):3230-3248.

PMID: 35758988 PMC: 9670091. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001240.

Ending genetic essentialism through genetics education.

Donovan B HGG Adv. 2022; 3(1):100058.

PMID: 35047848 PMC: 8756492. DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100058.

Categories convey prescriptive information across domains and development.

Foster-Hanson E, Roberts S, Gelman S, Rhodes M J Exp Child Psychol. 2021; 212:105231.

PMID: 34358722 PMC: 8666967. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105231.

References

Brescoll V, Uhlmann E, Newman G . The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 105(6):891-908. DOI: 10.1037/a0034701. View

Burnette J, OBoyle E, VanEpps E, Pollack J, Finkel E . Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychol Bull. 2012; 139(3):655-701. DOI: 10.1037/a0029531. View

Dewar K, Xu F . Do early nouns refer to kinds or distinct shapes? Evidence from 10-month-old infants. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(2):252-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02278.x. View

Smith M, Wood W, Knight J . The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008; 7(4):422-30. PMC: 2592048. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045. View

Lanie A, Jayaratne T, Sheldon J, Kardia S, Anderson E, Feldbaum M . Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Couns. 2009; 13(4):305-20. PMC: 3832055. DOI: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000035524.66944.6d. View

Gelman S, Markman E . Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child Dev. 1987; 58(6):1532-41. View

Williams M, Eberhardt J . Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(6):1033-47. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033. View

Graham S, Kilbreath C, Welder A . Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Dev. 2004; 75(2):409-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00683.x. View

Gelman S, Wellman H . Insides and essences: early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition. 1991; 38(3):213-44. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-q. View

10.

Keller J . In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 88(4):686-702. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686. View

11.

Newman G, Keil F . Where is the essence? Developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features. Child Dev. 2008; 79(5):1344-56. PMC: 2653253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01192.x. View

12.

Kvaale E, Gottdiener W, Haslam N . Biogenetic explanations and stigma: a meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 96:95-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.017. View

13.

Williams J, Smith L . Concepts of kinship relations and inheritance in childhood and adolescence. Br J Dev Psychol. 2010; 28(Pt 3):523-46. DOI: 10.1348/026151009x449568. View

14.

Morton T, Hornsey M, Postmes T . Shifting ground: the variable use of essentialism in contexts of inclusion and exclusion. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008; 48(Pt 1):35-59. DOI: 10.1348/014466607X270287. View

15.

Roberts S, Gelman S . Can White children grow up to be Black? Children's reasoning about the stability of emotion and race. Dev Psychol. 2016; 52(6):887-93. PMC: 4882227. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000132. View

16.

Carver R, Castera J, Gericke N, Evangelista N, El-Hani C . Young Adults' Belief in Genetic Determinism, and Knowledge and Attitudes towards Modern Genetics and Genomics: The PUGGS Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0169808. PMC: 5256916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169808. View

17.

Taborda-Osorio H, Cheries E . Infants' agent individuation: It's what's on the insides that counts. Cognition. 2018; 175:11-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.016. View

18.

Newman G, Herrmann P, Wynn K, Keil F . Biases towards internal features in infants' reasoning about objects. Cognition. 2007; 107(2):420-32. PMC: 2398765. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.006. View

19.

Haslam N, Levy S . Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: structure and implications for prejudice. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006; 32(4):471-85. DOI: 10.1177/0146167205276516. View

20.

Christensen K, Jayaratne T, Roberts J, Kardia S, Petty E . Understandings of basic genetics in the United States: results from a national survey of black and white men and women. Public Health Genomics. 2010; 13(7-8):467-76. PMC: 3025896. DOI: 10.1159/000293287. View