» Articles » PMID: 32190446

Factors Affecting Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2020 Mar 20
PMID 32190446
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a frequent cause of nontraumatic painful hip of the adolescence. It is the result of the separation of the proximal femoral growth cartilage at the level of the hypertrophic cell zone. The femoral neck metaphysis rotates externally and migrates proximally relative to the femoral head epiphysis, which is stably seated in the acetabulum; early diagnosis and in situ stabilization grants the best long term results. Numerous factors affect treatment outcomes. Not all implants have the same effect on the slipped physis. Application of the traditionally used implants, such as non-threaded pins and cannulated screws, is questioned. Modern implants are available, which stabilize the slip without accelerating physis fusion. This allows femoral head and neck growth and remodeling to limit the post-slip sequellae on hip anatomy and function. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) complicates almost all slips. It causes progressive labral and articular cartilage damage and leads to early hip osteoarthritis and total hip replacement, approximately ten years earlier compared to the general population. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a dramatic complication, seen almost exclusively in unstable slips. It develops within months after the slip and leads to immediate articular joint degeneration and the need for total hip replacement. Another serious complication of SCFE is chondrolysis, which is a rapid progressive articular cartilage degeneration leading to a narrow joint space and restriction of hip motion. Implant-related complications, such as migration and loosening, may lead to the progression of the slip. Though bilateral disease is quite frequent, there is no consensus about the need for preventive surgery on the healthy contralateral hip. Diagnosis of SCFE is frequently missed or delayed, leading to slips of higher severity. Silent slippage of the capital femoral epiphysis is highly suspected as an underlying cause of cam-type FAI and early-onset hip osteoarthritis. There is controversy, whether asymptomatic implants should be removed. Novel surgical techniques, such as the modified Dunn procedure and hip arthroscopy, seem to be effective modalities for the prevention of FAI in SCFE.

Citing Articles

Analysis of risk factors for difficult implant removal in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by cannulated screws.

Yang L, Liu L, Yang X, Tang X Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1414557.

PMID: 38840800 PMC: 11150616. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1414557.


Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a 5-year-old boy with cerebral palsy on valproic acid and levetiracetam for epilepsy: a case report.

Aldhafian O J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 2024(2):rjae058.

PMID: 38370596 PMC: 10871696. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae058.


Comparing pinning and capital realignment procedures for severe, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review.

Kennedy G, Pullan J, El-Bakoury A J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 10(3-4):238-243.

PMID: 38162270 PMC: 10757418. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnad032.


How Safe and Technical Is Modified Dunn Osteotomy in the Management of Patients with SCFE: A Clinical Trial with Short-Term Follow-Up.

Elsiofy A, Elsherif M, Eladawy M, Mahmoud T, Sakr A Adv Orthop. 2023; 2023:2742083.

PMID: 38099273 PMC: 10721343. DOI: 10.1155/2023/2742083.


Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Adolescents: Functional Outcomes and Return to Physical Activity after Surgical Treatment.

Giovanoulis V, Koutserimpas C, Vasiliadis A, Lepidas N, Carville S, Boulcourt S Maedica (Bucur). 2023; 18(3):420-425.

PMID: 38023740 PMC: 10674133. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.420.


References
1.
Swarup I, Goodbody C, Goto R, Sankar W, Fabricant P . Risk Factors for Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Meta-analysis of Cohort and Case-control Studies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020; 40(6):e446-e453. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001482. View

2.
Kumm D, Lee S, Hackenbroch M, Rutt J . Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a prospective study of dynamic screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (384):198-207. View

3.
Jerre R, BILLING L, Hansson G, Karlsson J, Wallin J . Bilaterality in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: importance of a reliable radiographic method. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996; 5(2):80-4. DOI: 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00005. View

4.
Engesaeter L, Engesaeter I, Fenstad A, Havelin L, Karrholm J, Garellick G . Low revision rate after total hip arthroplasty in patients with pediatric hip diseases. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(5):436-41. PMC: 3488168. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.736171. View

5.
Castro Jr F, Bennett J, Doulens K . Epidemiological perspective on prophylactic pinning in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20(6):745-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200011000-00009. View