» Articles » PMID: 32185801

Flexible Regression Approach to Propensity Score Analysis and Its Relationship with Matching and Weighting

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Mar 19
PMID 32185801
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In propensity score analysis, the frequently used regression adjustment involves regressing the outcome on the estimated propensity score and treatment indicator. This approach can be highly efficient when model assumptions are valid, but can lead to biased results when the assumptions are violated. We extend the simple regression adjustment to a varying coefficient regression model that allows for nonlinear association between outcome and propensity score. We discuss its connection with some propensity score matching and weighting methods, and show that the proposed analytical framework can shed light on the intrinsic connection among some mainstream propensity score approaches (stratification, regression, kernel matching, and inverse probability weighting) and handle commonly used causal estimands. We derive analytic point and variance estimators that properly take into account the sampling variability in the estimated propensity score. Extensive simulations show that the proposed approach possesses desired finite sample properties and demonstrates competitive performance in comparison with other methods estimating the same causal estimand. The proposed methodology is illustrated with a study on right heart catheterization.

Citing Articles

causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data.

Vakulenko-Lagun B, Magdamo C, Charpignon M, Zheng B, Albers M, Das S Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023; 242:107819.

PMID: 37774426 PMC: 10841064. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107819.


Preterm births prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: results from the national database.

Charles C, Souza Neto L, Soares C, Souza Araujo T, Torezzan C, Lima E Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14580.

PMID: 37666901 PMC: 10477268. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37871-x.


Does Internet Use Impact the Health Status of Middle-Aged and Older Populations? Evidence from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Li L, Ding H, Li Z Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35329305 PMC: 8954843. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063619.


Causal inference methods for small non-randomized studies: Methods and an application in COVID-19.

Friedrich S, Friede T Contemp Clin Trials. 2020; 99:106213.

PMID: 33188930 PMC: 7834813. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106213.

References
1.
Austin P, Grootendorst P, Normand S, Anderson G . Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2006; 26(4):754-68. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2618. View

2.
Robins J, Mark S, Newey W . Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders. Biometrics. 1992; 48(2):479-95. View

3.
Zou B, Zou F, Shuster J, Tighe P, Koch G, Zhou H . On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis. Stat Med. 2016; 35(20):3537-48. PMC: 4961520. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6943. View

4.
Austin P . A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2007; 27(12):2037-49. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3150. View

5.
Hade E, Lu B . Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate. Stat Med. 2013; 33(1):74-87. PMC: 4004383. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5884. View