» Articles » PMID: 32182989

Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Mar 19
PMID 32182989
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfection methods available for stethoscopes. In March 2019, we performed a search in PubMed and Scopus using the search terms: "reducing stethoscopes contamination" and "disinfection stethoscopes"; the Mesh terms used in PubMed were "Decontamination/methods" or "Disinfection/methods" and "Stethoscopes/microbiology". Selection criteria were: English language; at least one disinfection method tested. A total of 253 publications were screened. After title, abstract, and full-text analysis, 17 papers were included in the systematic review. Ethanol at 90%, Ethanol-Based Hands Sanitizer (EBHS), triclosan, chlorhexidine, isopropyl alcohol, 66% ethyl alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, and benzalkonium chloride have been proven to lower the presence of bacteria on stethoscopes' surfaces. In addition, alcohol wipes show effective results. A wearable device emitting ultraviolet C by Light-Emitting Diode (LED) resulted efficacious against common microorganisms involved in Healthcare Associated Infections. The cover impregnated with silver ions seemed to be associated with significantly higher colony counts. Instead, copper stethoscopes surface reduced bacterial load. The disinfection of stethoscopes appears to be essential. There are many valid methods available; the choice depends on various factors, such as the cost, availability, and practicality.

Citing Articles

Implementation of stethoscope disinfection: an observational study on nursing staff practice and knowledge.

Sahan S, Guler S, Korkmaz E GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024; 19:Doc30.

PMID: 38883408 PMC: 11177224. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000485.


A clinical study to evaluate the safe and effective use of a new, single use stethoscope cover to enable reduction in pathogen transmission during auscultation.

Nazari-Shafti T, Meyborg H, Iske J, Schloss M, Seeber F, Friedrich A Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1179145.

PMID: 37425319 PMC: 10324409. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1179145.


Stethoscopes or Maybe "Bacterioscopes" - Is hand Hygiene Solely Capable of Preventing Hospital-Associated Infections?.

Talaga-Cwiertnia K, Ochonska D, Gajda M, Kowalczyk M, Palczewska M, Brzychczy-Wloch M Pol J Microbiol. 2023; 72(1):79-91.

PMID: 36929886 PMC: 10280307. DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2023-012.


Impact of alcohol-based hand-rub disinfection on bacterial bioburden on stethoscopes in a real-world clinical setting.

Johnson A, Warren B, Anderson D, Johnson M, Gamez I, Smith B Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022; 44(6):1029-1031.

PMID: 35403584 PMC: 10262157. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.54.


In Vitro Effect of Photodynamic Therapy with Different Lights and Combined or Uncombined with Chlorhexidine on spp.

Perez-Laguna V, Barrena-Lopez Y, Gilaberte Y, Rezusta A Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 34452140 PMC: 8398142. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081176.


References
1.
Parmar R, Valvi C, Sira P, Kamat J . A prospective, randomised, double-blind study of comparative efficacy of immediate versus daily cleaning of stethoscope using 66% ethyl alcohol. Indian J Med Sci. 2004; 58(10):423-30. View

2.
Hill C, King T, Day R . A strategy to reduce MRSA colonization of stethoscopes. J Hosp Infect. 2005; 62(1):122-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.03.013. View

3.
Sengupta S, Sirkar A, Shivananda P . Stethoscopes and nosocomial infection. Indian J Pediatr. 2000; 67(3):197-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02723663. View

4.
OFlaherty N, Fenelon L . The stethoscope and healthcare-associated infection: a snake in the grass or innocent bystander?. J Hosp Infect. 2015; 91(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.04.010. View

5.
OGorman J, Humphreys H . Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now?. J Hosp Infect. 2012; 81(4):217-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.05.009. View