» Articles » PMID: 32178501

First Feasibility Study and Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Anterior Resection in Colorectal Cancer in Malaysia

Overview
Journal Ann Coloproctol
Date 2020 Mar 18
PMID 32178501
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection (LAAR) for colorectal cancer in a local Asian population.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients with colorectal cancer operated from November 2017 to October 2018. Main variables of interest were demography, type and surgery, length of stay (LOS), and the involvement of proximal and distal doughnut. Postoperative complications were analysed using chi-square or Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests.

Results: There were 23 patients with a mean age of 62.5 ± 12.2 years. The mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 97.1 ± 154.84 days. There were 12 patients in the LAAR group and 11 in the open anterior resection (OAR) group. Duration of surgery was shorter in OAR (129.58 ± 51.38 minutes) compared to LAAR (147.91 ± 39.37 minutes). Mean LOS was shorter in the LAAR group with 5±1.5 days compared to the OAR group of 7.42 ± 4.25 days. However, there was no significant P-value for both duration of surgery (P = 0.322) or LOS (P = 0.87). A total of 3 complications were recorded after OAR and 2 after LAAR. Both groups had clear proximal and distal margins with 16 (12-18.5) harvested lymph nodes in LAAR and 18 (16-22) in OAR, which were equal (P = 0.155).

Conclusion: This study reports a shorter LOS in the minimally invasive group of 2 days with similar oncologic resection outcomes. This shows that LAAR is feasible in Malaysia and has potential outcome benefits.

Citing Articles

Critical adjustments and trauma surgery trends in adaptation to COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.

Tan Chor Lip H, Huei T, Mohamad Y, Alwi R, Mat T Chin J Traumatol. 2020; 23(4):207-210.

PMID: 32653358 PMC: 7255157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.05.007.

References
1.
Zhu Q, Feng B, Lu A, Wang M, Hu W, Li J . Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: complications and management in 132 consecutive patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(36):4605-10. PMC: 2945495. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i36.4605. View

2.
Hewitt P, Ip S, Kwok S, Somers S, Li K, Leung K . Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41(7):901-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02235376. View

3.
Melotti G, Tamborrino E, Lazzaretti M, Bonilauri S, Mecheri F, Piccoli M . Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999; 16(4):332-6. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(199906)16:4<332::aid-ssu9>3.0.co;2-5. View

4.
Pedziwiatr M, Malczak P, Mizera M, Witowski J, Torbicz G, Major P . There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21(8):595-604. PMC: 5602007. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. View

5.
Bohm B, Milsom J, Kitago K, Brand M, Stolfi V, Fazio V . Use of laparoscopic techniques in oncologic right colectomy in a canine model. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995; 2(1):6-13. DOI: 10.1007/BF02303696. View