» Articles » PMID: 32173615

Assessment of a Satisfaction Measure for Use After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Mar 17
PMID 32173615
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a core outcome selected by the Outcomes Measurement in Rheumatology. Up to 20% of THA/TKA patients are dissatisfied. Improving patient satisfaction is hindered by the lack of a validated measurement tool that can accurately measure change.

Methods: The psychometric properties of a proposed satisfaction instrument, consisting of 4 questions rated on a Likert scale, scored 1-100, were tested for validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change using data collected between 2007 and 2011 in an arthroplasty registry.

Results: We demonstrated construct validity by confirming our hypothesis; satisfaction correlated with similar constructs. Satisfaction correlated moderately with pain relief (TKA ρ = 0.61, THA ρ = 0.47) and function (TKA ρ = 0.65, THA ρ = 0.51) at 2 years; there was no correlation with baseline/preoperative pain/function values, as expected. Overall Cronbach's alpha >0.88 confirmed internal consistency. Test-retest reliability with weighted kappa ranged 0.60-0.75 for TKA and 0.36-0.56 for THA. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores quality of life improvement (>30 points) corresponds to a mean satisfaction score of 93.2 (standard deviation, 11.5) after THA and 90.4 (standard deviation, 13.8) after TKA, and increasing relief of pain and functional improvement increased the strength of their association with satisfaction. The satisfaction measure has no copyright and is available free of cost and represents minimal responder burden.

Conclusion: Patient satisfaction with THA/TKA can be measured with a validated 4-item questionnaire. This satisfaction measure can be included in a total joint arthroplasty core measurement set for total joint arthroplasty trials.

Citing Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Norwegian version of the Goodman Satisfaction Score (GSS-NO) for patients with total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Bergvad I, Kottorp A, Aamodt A, Lerdal A, Skou S, Lindberg M Acta Orthop. 2025; 96():52-58.

PMID: 39804812 PMC: 11724478. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42703.


Early insights from the routine use of patient reported outcome measures in elective hip and knee arthroplasty at a public teaching hospital in South Australia.

Goldsmith S, Karayiannis P, Edwards L, Toson B, DMello F, Jackman E J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):131.

PMID: 39531137 PMC: 11557799. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00807-8.


WOMAC, Kujala Score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Quality of Life Thresholds for Predicting Increased and Decreased Likelihood of Failure to Improve Quality of Life After Total Knee Replacement.

Barahona M, Barahona M, Amstein C Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69853.

PMID: 39435220 PMC: 11493377. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69853.


Long-term clinical results and patient satisfaction of a metaphyseal-engaging anatomic cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.

Kim Y, Park J, Jang Y, Kim E Int Orthop. 2024; 48(12):3127-3137.

PMID: 39305314 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06322-1.


Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined with Proximal Femoral Reconstruction Effectively Treats Severe Hip Deformities: A Novel Osteotomy Technique.

Shen X, Zhang R, Mei J, Zhang X, Huang W, Zhu C Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(8):1939-1945.

PMID: 38894527 PMC: 11293906. DOI: 10.1111/os.14136.