» Articles » PMID: 32170044

Diagnostic Yield of Commercial Immunodots to Diagnose Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to detect onconeural antibodies associated with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs), we analyzed the proportion of confirmed positive results using alternative techniques.

Methods: Sera (n = 5,300) of patients with suspected PNS were tested by PNS+2 blot (Ravo Diagnostika; January 2016-May 2017) or EUROLINE PNS 12 Ag (Euroimmun; July 2017-November 2018). Positive samples were further explored by in-house indirect immunofluorescence and a third in-house technique (Western blot or cell-based assay) using recombinant protein. Those found negative by these 2 techniques were considered as nonconfirmed. We analyzed the relationship between band intensity and final confirmation. Clinical data were collected for all confirmed results and nonconfirmed EUROLINE immunodots.

Results: PNS+2 blot was positive in 128/1,658 (7.7%) sera and confirmed in 47/128 (36.7%). EUROLINE was positive in 186/3,626 (5.1%) and confirmed in 56/186 (30.1%). Confirmation was highly variable among the antibodies tested, from 7.2% (PNS+2 blot) and 5.8% (EUROLINE) for anti-Yo to 88.2% (PNS+2 blot) and 65.0% (EUROLINE) for anti-Hu. None of the 27 weak positive sera by EUROLINE was confirmed. Band intensity in confirmed cases was variable among the antibodies from strong positive for all anti-Yo (n = 3) and anti-Hu (n = 11) to positive (n = 19) or strong positive (n = 9) for anti-SOX1. Among patients with a nonconfirmed EUROLINE result and available clinical information, all had an alternative diagnosis, and only 6.7% had cancer.

Conclusions: Immunodots may be useful for PNS screening, but a threshold should be established for each antibody, and clinical information and confirmation by other techniques are essential.

Classification Of Evidence: The study provides Class IV evidence that immunodot assays for onconeural antibodies accurately identify patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Citing Articles

Commercial immunoassays in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: an Australian laboratory perspective.

Ali S, Cecchin A, Burfoot R, Chia N, Ravindran J, Field D Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1515069.

PMID: 40027164 PMC: 11868762. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1515069.


Altered exosomal miRNA profiles in patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.

Tveit Solheim E, Vestrheim Thomsen L, Bjorge L, Anandan S, Peter E, Desestret V Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024; 11(12):3255-3266.

PMID: 39473143 PMC: 11651201. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52232.


Autoimmune Encephalitis and Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes: A Nationwide Study on Epidemiology and Antibody Testing Performance.

Kerstens J, Schreurs M, de Vries J, Neuteboom R, Brenner J, Crijnen Y Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024; 11(6):e200318.

PMID: 39467237 PMC: 11521097. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200318.


Autoimmune Encephalitis and Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-like Manifestations.

Yamahara N, Takekoshi A, Kimura A, Shimohata T Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452025 PMC: 11506429. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14101012.


Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes Associated With Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Ciano-Petersen N, Muniz-Castrillo S, Villagran-Garcia M, Farina A, Vogrig A, Wucher V Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024; 11(6):e200260.

PMID: 39388653 PMC: 11474543. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200260.


References
1.
Graus F, Delattre J, Antoine J, Dalmau J, Giometto B, Grisold W . Recommended diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75(8):1135-40. PMC: 1739186. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.034447. View

2.
Thirkill C, Tait R, Tyler N, Roth A, Keltner J . The cancer-associated retinopathy antigen is a recoverin-like protein. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33(10):2768-72. View

3.
Saiz A, Blanco Y, Sabater L, Gonzalez F, Bataller L, Casamitjana R . Spectrum of neurological syndromes associated with glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: diagnostic clues for this association. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 10):2553-63. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn183. View

4.
Picard C, Vincent T, Lega J, Hue S, Fortenfant F, Lakomy D . Heterogeneous clinical spectrum of anti-SRP myositis and importance of the methods of detection of anti-SRP autoantibodies: a multicentric study. Immunol Res. 2016; 64(3):677-86. DOI: 10.1007/s12026-015-8774-6. View

5.
Johannis W, Renno J, Wielckens K, Voltz R . Ma2 antibodies: an evaluation of commercially available detection methods. Clin Lab. 2011; 57(5-6):321-6. View