» Articles » PMID: 32168227

Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage

Overview
Journal Obstet Gynecol
Date 2020 Mar 14
PMID 32168227
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To predict a woman's risk of postpartum hemorrhage at labor admission using machine learning and statistical models.

Methods: Predictive models were constructed and compared using data from 10 of 12 sites in the U.S. Consortium for Safe Labor Study (2002-2008) that consistently reported estimated blood loss at delivery. The outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as an estimated blood loss at least 1,000 mL. Fifty-five candidate risk factors routinely available on labor admission were considered. We used logistic regression with and without lasso regularization (lasso regression) as the two statistical models, and random forest and extreme gradient boosting as the two machine learning models to predict postpartum hemorrhage. Model performance was measured by C statistics (ie, concordance index), calibration, and decision curves. Models were constructed from the first phase (2002-2006) and externally validated (ie, temporally) in the second phase (2007-2008). Further validation was performed combining both temporal and site-specific validation.

Results: Of the 152,279 assessed births, 7,279 (4.8%, 95% CI 4.7-4.9) had postpartum hemorrhage. All models had good-to-excellent discrimination. The extreme gradient boosting model had the best discriminative ability to predict postpartum hemorrhage (C statistic: 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.93), followed by random forest (C statistic: 0.92; 95% CI 0.91-0.92). The lasso regression model (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88) and logistic regression (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.87) had lower-but-good discriminative ability. The above results held with validation across both time and sites. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that, although all models provided superior net benefit when clinical decision thresholds were between 0% and 80% predicted risk, the extreme gradient boosting model provided the greatest net benefit.

Conclusion: Postpartum hemorrhage on labor admission can be predicted with excellent discriminative ability using machine learning and statistical models. Further clinical application is needed, which may assist health care providers to be prepared and triage at-risk women.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of machine learning and traditional statistical models in the prediction of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review.

Baeta T, Rocha A, Oliveira J, Couto da Silva A, Reis Z BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e094455.

PMID: 40032385 PMC: 11877273. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094455.


Using machine learning model for predicting risk of memory decline: A cross sectional study.

Song Y, Sun Y, Weng Q, Yi L Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39575.

PMID: 39506952 PMC: 11538755. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39575.


The role of artificial intelligence in transforming maternity services in Africa: prospects and challenges.

Bolarinwa O, Mohammed A, Igharo V Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2024; 18:26334941241288587.

PMID: 39465184 PMC: 11503737. DOI: 10.1177/26334941241288587.


Predicting Intra- and Postpartum Hemorrhage through Artificial Intelligence.

Susanu C, Harabor A, Vasilache I, Harabor V, Calin A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459391 PMC: 11509710. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101604.


Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review.

Lin X, Liang C, Liu J, Lyu T, Ghumman N, Campbell B J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e54737.

PMID: 39283665 PMC: 11443205. DOI: 10.2196/54737.


References
1.
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller A, Daniels J . Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2(6):e323-33. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. View

2.
Fohner A, Greene J, Lawson B, Chen J, Kipnis P, Escobar G . Assessing clinical heterogeneity in sepsis through treatment patterns and machine learning. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26(12):1466-1477. PMC: 7647146. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz106. View

3.
Menard M, Main E, Currigan S . Executive summary of the reVITALize initiative: standardizing obstetric data definitions. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124(1):150-153. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000322. View

4.
Rossi R, Requarth E, Warshak C, Dufendach K, Hall E, DeFranco E . Predictive Model for Failed Induction of Labor Among Obese Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134(3):485-493. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003377. View

5.
Bi Q, Goodman K, Kaminsky J, Lessler J . What is Machine Learning? A Primer for the Epidemiologist. Am J Epidemiol. 2019; 188(12):2222-2239. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz189. View