» Articles » PMID: 32166657

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Biologic Therapy with Ixekizumab Versus Secukinumab in the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis with Concomitant Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in the UK

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 14
PMID 32166657
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) antagonists are a recent innovation for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). There are currently no cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) comparing the IL-17A antagonists ixekizumab and secukinumab in PsA from a UK perspective.

Objective: We conducted a CEA from the UK National Health Service perspective to compare ixekizumab versus secukinumab in patients with PsA and concomitant moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Methods: A Markov model was developed based on the widely accepted York model. In biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve patients, ixekizumab → ustekinumab → best supportive care (BSC) was compared with secukinumab → ustekinumab → BSC. For bDMARD-experienced patients, ixekizumab → BSC was compared with secukinumab → BSC. At the end of the bDMARD trial period, Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) responders continued to receive the bDMARD in the continuous treatment period. PsARC nonresponders and patients who ceased continuous treatment transitioned to the trial period of the next treatment.

Results: Ixekizumab was less costly and provided more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than secukinumab in bDMARD-naïve and -experienced patients based on list prices, although cost savings and QALY gains were small to modest. In bDMARD-naïve patients, total costs were £155,455 compared with £155,530 for secukinumab (year 2017 values). Total QALYs were 8.127 versus 7.989. In bDMARD-experienced patients, the corresponding values were £140,051 versus £140,264 for total costs and 3.996 versus 3.875 for total QALYs.

Conclusion: Ixekizumab provided more QALYs at a marginally lower cost than secukinumab, and the results were most sensitive to changes in drug costs. Other factors, such as patient preferences for the number of injections and confidential price discounts, may be important considerations in clinical decision-making.

Citing Articles

Sequential biologic therapy in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Xie O, Wu M, Li A, Meng K, Xiang H, Tan C Clin Rheumatol. 2025; .

PMID: 39982592 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-025-07368-1.


Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Literature Review.

Antonazzo I, Gribaudo G, La Vecchia A, Ferrara P, Piraino A, Cortesi P Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(12):1329-1343.

PMID: 39182010 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01428-1.


Development and Characterization of New Monoclonal Antibodies Against Porcine Interleukin-17A and Interferon-Gamma.

Manirarora J, Walker K, Patil V, Renukaradhya G, LaBresh J, Sullivan Y Front Immunol. 2022; 13:786396.

PMID: 35185884 PMC: 8850701. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.786396.


Quantitative Evidence Synthesis Methods for the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Clinical and Economic Decision Making: A Review and Taxonomy of Simplifying Assumptions.

Lewis R, Hughes D, Sutton A, Wilkinson C Pharmacoeconomics. 2020; 39(1):25-61.

PMID: 33242191 PMC: 7790782. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w.

References
1.
Kavanaugh A, Cassell S . The assessment of disease activity and outcomes in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S142-7. View

2.
Cummins E, Asseburg C, Prasad M, Buchanan J, Punekar Y . Cost effectiveness of golimumab for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis. Eur J Health Econ. 2011; 13(6):801-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0335-x. View

3.
Greenberg J, Palmer J, Li Y, Herrera V, Tsang Y, Liao M . Healthcare Resource Use and Direct Costs in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis in a Large US Cohort. J Rheumatol. 2015; 43(1):88-96. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150540. View

4.
Gottlieb A, Strand V, Kishimoto M, Mease P, Thaci D, Birt J . Ixekizumab improves patient-reported outcomes up to 52 weeks in bDMARD-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (SPIRIT-P1). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018; 57(10):1777-1788. PMC: 6152421. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key161. View

5.
Kawalec P, Malinowski K . The indirect costs of psoriatic arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014; 15(1):125-32. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.965154. View