Implementation of an ICU Recovery Clinic at a Tertiary Care Academic Center
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Design: Adults admitted to the medical ICU of a large tertiary care academic hospital with shock and/or respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation were screened for participation in a newly formed ICU recovery clinic. Participant selection and attendance rates were tracked. Reasons for nonattendance were assessed by phone call in a subset of patients.
Setting: A newly formed ICU recovery clinic of a large tertiary care academic hospital.
Patients: All patients admitted to the medical ICU were screened.
Interventions: ICU recovery clinic appointments were scheduled for all eligible patients. A subset of nonattenders were called to assess reasons for nonattendance.
Measurements And Main Results: Over 2 years, we admitted 5,510 patients to our medical ICU. Three hundred sixty-two were screened into the recovery clinic. One-hundred sixty-six were not scheduled for clinic; major reasons included discharge to hospice/death in the hospital ( = 55) and discharge to a facility ( = 50). One-hundred ninety-six patients were scheduled for a visit and of those, 101 (52%) arrived to clinic. Reasons for nonattendance in a surveyed subset of nonattenders included patient's lack of awareness of the appointment (50%, = 9/18), financial concerns (17%, = 3/18), and transportation difficulty (17%, = 3/18).
Conclusions: ICU recovery clinics may address the needs of survivors of critical illness. Barriers to clinic attendance include high mortality rates, high rates of clinic appointment cancelations and nonattendance, and discharge to locations such as skilled nursing facilities or long-term acute care hospitals. Improved communication to patients about the role of the clinic may facilitate attendance and minimize canceled appointments.
Mason C, Adie S, Shea M, Konerman M, Thomas M, McSparron J Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 38.
PMID: 38434252 PMC: 10906849. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100363.
Post-intensive care syndrome: Recent advances and future directions.
Inoue S, Nakanishi N, Amaya F, Fujinami Y, Hatakeyama J, Hifumi T Acute Med Surg. 2024; 11(1):e929.
PMID: 38385144 PMC: 10879727. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.929.
Hill L, Thompson C, Balcombe S, Jain S, He F, Karris-Young M HIV Med. 2023; 25(3):332-342.
PMID: 38012059 PMC: 10932925. DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13577.
Eaton T, Lincoln T, Lewis A, Davis B, Sevin C, Valley T J Palliat Med. 2023; 26(12):1644-1653.
PMID: 37831930 PMC: 10771886. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0034.
Factors Influencing Engagement with in-Person Intensive Care Unit Recovery Clinic Services.
Boehm L, Danesh V, LaNoue M, Trochez R, Jones A, Kimpel C J Intensive Care Med. 2022; 38(4):375-381.
PMID: 36128790 PMC: 9991933. DOI: 10.1177/08850666221127154.