» Articles » PMID: 32156304

Posterior-only Vs. Combined Posterior-anterior Approaches in Treating Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis: a Retrospective Study with Minimum 7-year Follow-up

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Mar 12
PMID 32156304
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is no comparative study with long-term follow-up between posterior-only and combined posterior-anterior approaches in treating lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB) and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis (LSSTB). This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate the long-term outcomes of these two surgical approaches in LSTB and LSSTB.

Methods: Thirty patients with LSTB and 12 patients with LSSTB underwent posterior-only approach (group A); 26 patients with LSTB and 14 patients with LSSTB were managed with combined posterior-anterior approaches (group B). Analysis and comparison in clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two groups were performed.

Results: The intra-operative bleeding amount, surgery time, and hospitalization days in group A were less than that in group B (P < 0.05). These patients were followed for a minimum of 7 years. All patients achieved completely healing within 2-year follow-up. Bony fusion was obtained in all patients. The visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Oswestry Disability index, and Kirkaldy-Willis functional evaluation at the final visit demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved satisfactory results. There was no significant difference in angle correction or maintaining correction between combined posterior-anterior approaches and posterior-only approach (P > 0.05). Complications occurred in both groups.

Conclusions: Both combined posterior-anterior approaches and posterior-only approach can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of long-term in treating LSTB and LSSTB, while posterior-only approach can safely and effectively achieve lesion debridement, decompression, and stability reconstruction and maintenance with the advantages of less invasive surgery, less bleeding, shorter surgery time, and hospital stay, and fewer complications. So, posterior-only approach seemed to be superior to the combined posterior-anterior one.

Citing Articles

Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Tuberculosis: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparative Study.

He J, Deng J, Yang Y, Zheng T, Luo F, Xu J Neurospine. 2024; 20(4):1306-1318.

PMID: 38171298 PMC: 10762411. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346692.346.


Circumferential approach via dynamic position in OLIF combined with freehand screw pedicle fixation for lumbar tuberculosis requiring multilevel instrumentation: a 3-year retrospective study.

He J, Luo F, Fang Q, Xiang Y, Xu J, Zhang Z J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):469.

PMID: 37386508 PMC: 10308666. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03959-3.


Comparison of Long-Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes between the Anterior and Combined Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treating Lumbosacral Tuberculosis.

Zhang Z, Hu B, Wang L, Li T, Yang H, Liu L Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(4):973-982.

PMID: 36750359 PMC: 10102319. DOI: 10.1111/os.13682.


Single Posterior Surgery Versus Combined Posterior-Anterior Surgery for Lumbar Tuberculosis Patients.

Duan D, Cui Y, Gong L, Fan Y, Liu J, Zhou Y Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(3):868-877.

PMID: 36655386 PMC: 9977579. DOI: 10.1111/os.13628.


Posterior transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion with instrumentation for multi-segment thoracic spinal tuberculosis: a midterm follow-up study.

Xu Z, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Wang X Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18244.

PMID: 36309556 PMC: 9617847. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23169-x.


References
1.
Zou D, Zhou J, Zhou X, Jiang X . Clinical efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous huge ilio-psoas abscesses drainage combined with posterior approach surgery for the management of dorsal and lumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103(8):1251-1255. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.015. View

2.
Bezer M, Kucukdurmaz F, Aydin N, Kocaoglu B, Guven O . Tuberculous spondylitis of the lumbosacral region: long-term follow-up of patients treated by chemotherapy, transpedicular drainage, posterior instrumentation, and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(5):425-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000171627.11171.6f. View

3.
Li J, Huang X, Chen F, Dai F, Zhou Q, Luo F . Computed Tomography-Guided Catheterization Drainage to Cure Spinal Tuberculosis With Individualized Chemotherapy. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e443-e449. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170117-02. View

4.
Zhang H, Lin M, Ge L, Li J, Wu J, Liu J . Surgical management by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation for lumbo-sacral tuberculosis in the aged. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(12):1677-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1604-6. View

5.
Li M, Du J, Meng H, Wang Z, Luo Z . One-stage surgical management for thoracic tuberculosis by anterior debridement, decompression and autogenous rib grafts, and instrumentation. Spine J. 2011; 11(8):726-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.06.009. View