» Articles » PMID: 32150587

Chronic Microfiber Exposure in Adult Japanese Medaka (Oryzias Latipes)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Mar 10
PMID 32150587
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microplastic fibers (MFs) pollute aquatic habitats globally via sewage release, stormwater runoff, or atmospheric deposition. Of the synthetic MFs, polyester (PES) and polypropylene (PP) are the most common. Field studies show that fish ingest large quantities of MFs. However, few laboratory studies have addressed host responses, particularly at the organ and tissue levels. Adult Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), a laboratory model fish, were exposed to aqueous concentrations of PES or PP MFs (10,000 MFs/L) for 21 days. Medaka egested 1,367 ± 819 PES MFs (0.1 ± 0.04 mg) and 157 ± 105 PP MFs (1.4 ± 0.06 mg) per 24 hrs, with PP egestion increasing over time. Exposure did not result in changes in body condition, gonadosomatic- or hepatosomatic indices. PES exposure resulted in no reproductive changes, but females exposed to PP MFs produced more eggs over time. MF exposure did not affect embryonic mortality, development, or hatching. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of gills revealed denuding of epithelium on arches, fusion of primary lamellae, and increased mucus. Histologic sections revealed aneurysms in secondary lamellae, epithelial lifting, and swellings of inner opercular membrane that altered morphology of rostral most gill lamellae. SEM and histochemical analyses showed increased mucous cells and secretions on epithelium of foregut; however, overt abrasions with sloughing of cells were absent. For these reasons, increased focus at the tissue and cell levels proved necessary to appreciate toxicity associated with MFs.

Citing Articles

Single and combined toxicity of tadalafil (Cilais) and microplastic in Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus).

Sabra M, Sayed A, Idriss S, Soliman H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14576.

PMID: 38914580 PMC: 11196265. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64282-3.


Journey of micronanoplastics with blood components.

Rajendran D, Chandrasekaran N RSC Adv. 2023; 13(45):31435-31459.

PMID: 37901269 PMC: 10603568. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra05620a.


Functional Trait-Based Evidence of Microplastic Effects on Aquatic Species.

Berlino M, Sara G, Mangano M Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37372096 PMC: 10294819. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060811.


Systematic Review of Nano- and Microplastics' (NMP) Influence on the Bioaccumulation of Environmental Contaminants: Part II-Freshwater Organisms.

Ribeiro F, Pavlaki M, Loureiro S, Sarmento R, Soares A, Tourinho P Toxics. 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37368574 PMC: 10303264. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11060474.


A Holistic Assessment of Polyethylene Fiber Ingestion in Larval and Juvenile Japanese Medaka Fish.

DiBona E, Pinnell L, Heising-Huang A, Geist S, Turner J, Seemann F Front Physiol. 2021; 12:668645.

PMID: 34421633 PMC: 8371532. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.668645.


References
1.
Jabeen K, Su L, Li J, Yang D, Tong C, Mu J . Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environ Pollut. 2016; 221:141-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.055. View

2.
Grigorakis S, Mason S, Drouillard K . Determination of the gut retention of plastic microbeads and microfibers in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Chemosphere. 2016; 169:233-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.055. View

3.
Rochman C, Kurobe T, Flores I, Teh S . Early warning signs of endocrine disruption in adult fish from the ingestion of polyethylene with and without sorbed chemical pollutants from the marine environment. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 493:656-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.051. View

4.
Anbumani S, Kakkar P . Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics on biota: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25(15):14373-14396. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1999-x. View

5.
Hu L, Chernick M, Hinton D, Shi H . Microplastics in Small Waterbodies and Tadpoles from Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ Sci Technol. 2018; 52(15):8885-8893. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02279. View