» Articles » PMID: 32149716

A Mobile Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Smoking Cessation: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2020 Mar 10
PMID 32149716
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smartphone apps for smoking cessation could offer easily accessible, highly tailored, intensive interventions at a fraction of the cost of traditional counseling. Although there are hundreds of publicly available smoking cessation apps, few have been empirically evaluated using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. The Smart-Treatment (Smart-T2) app is a just-in-time adaptive intervention that uses ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to assess the risk for imminent smoking lapse and tailors treatment messages based on the risk of lapse and reported symptoms.

Objective: This 3-armed pilot RCT aimed to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an automated smartphone-based smoking cessation intervention (Smart-T2) relative to standard in-person smoking cessation clinic care and the National Cancer Institute's free smoking cessation app, QuitGuide.

Methods: Adult smokers who attended a clinic-based tobacco cessation program were randomized into groups and followed for 13 weeks (1 week prequitting through 12 weeks postquitting). All study participants received nicotine patches and gum and were asked to complete EMAs five times a day on study-provided smartphones for 5 weeks. Participants in the Smart-T2 group received tailored treatment messages after the completion of each EMA. Both Smart-T2 and QuitGuide apps offer on-demand smoking cessation treatment.

Results: Of 81 participants, 41 (50%) were women and 55 (68%) were white. On average, participants were aged 49.6 years and smoked 22.4 cigarettes per day at baseline. A total of 17% (14/81) of participants were biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinent at 12 weeks postquitting (Smart-T2: 6/27, 22%, QuitGuide: 4/27, 15%, and usual care: 4/27, 15%), with no significant differences across groups (P>.05). Participants in the Smart-T2 group rated the app positively, with most participants agreeing that they can rely on the app to help them quit smoking, and endorsed the belief that the app would help them stay quit, and these responses were not significantly different from the ratings given by participants in the usual care group.

Conclusions: Dynamic smartphone apps that tailor intervention content in real time may increase user engagement and exposure to treatment-related materials. The results of this pilot RCT suggest that smartphone-based smoking cessation treatments may be capable of providing similar outcomes to traditional, in-person counseling.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02930200; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02930200.

Citing Articles

Adapting a Mobile Health App for Smoking Cessation in Black Adults With Anxiety Through an Analysis of the Mobile Anxiety Sensitivity Program Proof-of-Concept Trial: Qualitative Study.

Cheney M, Alexander A, Garey L, Gallagher M, Hebert E, Vujanovic A JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e53566.

PMID: 39918847 PMC: 11845881. DOI: 10.2196/53566.


A mixed-methods investigation of an ecological momentary assessment protocol for cigarette-smoking youth: Psychometric properties and participant experiences.

Kochhar S, Scholten H, Maciejewski D, Pingel M, Luijten M Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025; 14:100314.

PMID: 39867465 PMC: 11759552. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100314.


Smoking Cessation Smartphone App for Nondaily Smoking With Telephone Onboarding: Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hoeppner B, Siegel K, Futter A, Finley-Abboud D, Williamson A, Kahler C JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025; 13:e53971.

PMID: 39814363 PMC: 11780296. DOI: 10.2196/53971.


Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions.

Hsu T, Whelan P, Gandrup J, Armitage C, Cordingley L, McBeth J Br J Health Psychol. 2024; 30(1):e12766.

PMID: 39542743 PMC: 11583291. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12766.


Initial Evaluation of Acceptability, Engagement, and Effectiveness of the MO App to Provide Tailored and Comprehensive Support for Smoking Cessation: Development and Usability Study.

Zhou S, Brunetta P, Silvasstar J, Feldman G, Oromi N, Bull S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e55239.

PMID: 39471372 PMC: 11558213. DOI: 10.2196/55239.


References
1.
Hyland A, Borland R, Li Q, Yong H, McNeill A, Fong G . Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii83-94. PMC: 2593055. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.013516. View

2.
Boyer E, Fletcher R, Fay R, Smelson D, Ziedonis D, Picard R . Preliminary efforts directed toward the detection of craving of illicit substances: the iHeal project. J Med Toxicol. 2012; 8(1):5-9. PMC: 3550228. DOI: 10.1007/s13181-011-0200-4. View

3.
Shiffman S, Balabanis M, Gwaltney C, Paty J, Gnys M, Kassel J . Prediction of lapse from associations between smoking and situational antecedents assessed by ecological momentary assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 91(2-3):159-68. PMC: 2244586. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.017. View

4.
Boland V, Stockings E, Mattick R, McRobbie H, Brown J, Courtney R . The Methodological Quality and Effectiveness of Technology-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions for Disadvantaged Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 20(3):276-285. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw391. View

5.
Zbikowski S, Hapgood J, Barnwell S, McAfee T . Phone and web-based tobacco cessation treatment: real-world utilization patterns and outcomes for 11,000 tobacco users. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(5):e41. PMC: 2630835. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.999. View