» Articles » PMID: 32148445

Benefit of Contact Force-Guided Catheter Ablation for Treating Premature Ventricular Contractions

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 10
PMID 32148445
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated whether an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter would improve the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions who underwent ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter (56 patients, SmartTouch) or conventional catheter (59 patients, ThermoCool) at our hospital from August 2013 through December 2015. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 5 months, 3 patients in the conventional group had recurrences, compared with none in the contact force group. Complications occurred only in the conventional group (one steam pop; 2 ablations suspended because of significantly increasing impedance). In the contact force group, the median contact force during ablation was 10 g (interquartile range, 7-14 g). Times for overall procedure (36.9 ± 5 min), fluoroscopy (86.3 ± 22.7 s), and ablation (60.3 ± 21.4 s) were significantly shorter in the contact force group than in the conventional group (46.2 ± 6.2 min, 107.7 ± 30 s, and 88.7 ± 32.3 s, respectively; <0.001). In the contact force group, cases with a force-time integral <560 gram-seconds (g-s) had significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times (both <0.001) than did those with a force-time integral ≥560 g-s. These findings suggest that ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract with an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter instead of a conventional catheter shortens overall procedure, fluoroscopy, and ablation times without increasing risk of recurrence or complications.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of single-procedure radiofrequency catheter ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Jiang Z, Guo C, Liu Q, Tian Y, Tian L, Yang Y BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e081815.

PMID: 38382956 PMC: 10882318. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081815.


Impact of catheter ablation procedure on optical coherence tomography angiography findings in patients with ventricular arrhythmia.

Kurtul B, Kurtul A, Kaypakli O Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023; 69(9):e20230489.

PMID: 37729374 PMC: 10508935. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230489.


Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: strategies to improve outcomes.

Subramanian M, Atreya A, Saggu D, Yalagudri S, Calambur N Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:966634.

PMID: 37645526 PMC: 10461400. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.966634.


Contact Force-Sensing versus Standard Catheters in Non-Fluoroscopic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Karkowski G, Kuniewicz M, Zabek A, Kozluk E, Debski M, Matusik P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35160043 PMC: 8836481. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030593.

References
1.
Akca F, Janse P, Theuns D, Szili-Torok T . A prospective study on safety of catheter ablation procedures: contact force guided ablation could reduce the risk of cardiac perforation. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 179:441-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.105. View

2.
Kuck K, Reddy V, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N . A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 9(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.021. View

3.
Valk S, de Groot N, Jordaens L . Catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia using contact force guidance. Neth Heart J. 2014; 22(10):460-2. PMC: 4188848. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-013-0492-x. View

4.
Barnett A, Bahnson T, Piccini J . Recent Advances in Lesion Formation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9(5). PMC: 4843816. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003299. View

5.
Otomo K, Uno K, Fujiwara H, Isobe M, Iesaka Y . Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7(9):1291-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.014. View