» Articles » PMID: 32142642

Pulsed Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields Induce Tumor Membrane Disruption and Altered Cell Viability

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2020 Mar 7
PMID 32142642
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tumor cells express a unique cell surface glycocalyx with upregulation of sulfated glycosaminoglycans and charged glycoproteins. Little is known about how electromagnetic fields interact with this layer, particularly with regard to harnessing unique properties for therapeutic benefit. We applied a pulsed 20-millitesla (mT) magnetic field with rate of rise (dB/dt) in the msec range to cultured tumor cells to assess whether this affects membrane integrity as measured using cytolytic assays. A 10-min exposure of A549 human lung cancer cells to sequential 50- and 385-Hz oscillating magnetic fields was sufficient to induce intracellular protease release, suggesting altered membrane integrity after the field exposure. Heparinase treatment, which digests anionic sulfated glycan polymers, before exposure rendered cells insensitive to this effect. We further examined a non-neoplastic human primary cell line (lung lymphatic endothelial cells) as a typical normal host cell from the lung cancer microenvironment and found no effect of field exposure on membrane integrity. The field exposure was also sufficient to alter proliferation of tumor cells in culture, but not that of normal lymphatic cells. Pulsed magnetic field exposure of human breast cancer cells that express a sialic-acid rich glycocalyx also induced protease release, and this was partially abrogated by sialidase pretreatment, which removes cell surface anionic sialic acid. Scanning electron microscopy showed that field exposure may induce unique membrane "rippling" along with nanoscale pores on A549 cells. These effects were caused by a short exposure to pulsed 20-mT magnetic fields, and future work may examine greater magnitude effects. The proof of concept herein points to a mechanistic basis for possible applications of pulsed magnetic fields in novel anticancer strategies.

Citing Articles

Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields.

Tota M, Jonderko L, Witek J, Novickij V, Kulbacka J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201657 PMC: 11354277. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168973.


Integrating electromagnetic cancer stress with immunotherapy: a therapeutic paradigm.

Fuster M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1417621.

PMID: 39165679 PMC: 11333800. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417621.


Gradient Rotating Magnetic Fields Impairing F-Actin-Related Gene CCDC150 to Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis by Inactivating TGF-β1/SMAD3 Signaling Pathway.

Zhang G, Yu T, Chai X, Zhang S, Liu J, Zhou Y Research (Wash D C). 2024; 7:0320.

PMID: 38420580 PMC: 10900498. DOI: 10.34133/research.0320.


Glycocalyx transduces membrane leak in brain tumor cells exposed to sharp magnetic pulsing.

Johns S, Gupta P, Lee Y, Friend J, Fuster M Biophys J. 2023; 122(22):4425-4439.

PMID: 37992690 PMC: 10698326. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.020.


Spinning magnetic field patterns that cause oncolysis by oxidative stress in glioma cells.

Hambarde S, Manalo J, Baskin D, Sharpe M, Helekar S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19264.

PMID: 37935811 PMC: 10630398. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46758-w.


References
1.
Nagarajan A, Malvi P, Wajapeyee N . Heparan Sulfate and Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in Cancer Initiation and Progression. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9:483. PMC: 6118229. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00483. View

2.
Zhang X, Zhang H, Zheng C, Li C, Zhang X, Xiong W . Extremely low frequency (ELF) pulsed-gradient magnetic fields inhibit malignant tumour growth at different biological levels. Cell Biol Int. 2002; 26(7):599-603. DOI: 10.1006/cbir.2002.0883. View

3.
Tatarov I, Panda A, Petkov D, Kolappaswamy K, Thompson K, Kavirayani A . Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability. Comp Med. 2012; 61(4):339-45. PMC: 3155400. View

4.
Rodrigues E, Macauley M . Hypersialylation in Cancer: Modulation of Inflammation and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(6). PMC: 6025361. DOI: 10.3390/cancers10060207. View

5.
Dechecchi M, Melotti P, Bonizzato A, Santacatterina M, Chilosi M, Cabrini G . Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans are receptors sufficient to mediate the initial binding of adenovirus types 2 and 5. J Virol. 2001; 75(18):8772-80. PMC: 115122. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.18.8772-8780.2001. View