» Articles » PMID: 32142507

Evaluation of a Very Brief Pedometer-based Physical Activity Intervention Delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: The majority of people do not achieve recommended levels of physical activity. There is a need for effective, scalable interventions to promote activity. Self-monitoring by pedometer is a potentially suitable strategy. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief (5-minute) pedometer-based intervention ('Step It Up') delivered as part of National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care.

Methods And Findings: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial was a two parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England. Participants were 1,007 healthy adults aged 40 to 74 years eligible for an NHS Health Check. They were randomly allocated (1:1) using a web-based tool between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, to either intervention (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice. Participants were aware of study group allocation. Control participants received the NHS Health Check only. Intervention participants additionally received Step It Up: a 5-minute face-to-face discussion, written materials, pedometer, and step chart. The primary outcome was accelerometer-based physical activity volume at 3-month follow-up adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, and general practice. Secondary outcomes included time spent in different intensities of physical activity, self-reported physical activity, and economic measures. We conducted an in-depth fidelity assessment on a subsample of Health Check consultations. Participants' mean age was 56 years, two-thirds were female, they were predominantly white, and two-thirds were in paid employment. The primary outcome was available in 859 (85.3%) participants. There was no significant between-group difference in activity volume at 3 months (adjusted intervention effect 8.8 counts per minute [cpm]; 95% CI -18.7 to 36.3; p = 0.53). We found no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes of step counts per day, time spent in moderate or vigorous activity, time spent in vigorous activity, and time spent in moderate-intensity activity (accelerometer-derived variables); as well as in total physical activity, home-based activity, work-based activity, leisure-based activity, commuting physical activity, and screen or TV time (self-reported physical activity variables). Of the 505 intervention participants, 491 (97%) received the Step it Up intervention. Analysis of 37 intervention consultations showed that 60% of Step it Up components were delivered faithfully. The intervention cost £18.04 per participant. Incremental cost to the NHS per 1,000-step increase per day was £96 and to society was £239. Adverse events were reported by 5 intervention participants (of which 2 were serious) and 5 control participants (of which 2 were serious). The study's limitations include a participation rate of 16% and low return of audiotapes by practices for fidelity assessment.

Conclusions: In this large well-conducted trial, we found no evidence of effect of a plausible very brief pedometer intervention embedded in NHS Health Checks on objectively measured activity at 3-month follow-up.

Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN72691150).

Citing Articles

Statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial examining pedometer-based walking intervention in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the WATCHFUL trial.

Vetrovsky T, Siranec M, Frybova T, Gant I, Semerad M, Miklikova M Trials. 2023; 24(1):539.

PMID: 37587489 PMC: 10433657. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07516-5.


Tools to guide clinical discussions on physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep for health promotion between primary care providers and adults accessing care: a scoping review.

Morgan T, Faught E, Ross-White A, Fortier M, Duggan M, Jain R BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):140.

PMID: 37420229 PMC: 10326959. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02091-9.


mHealth intervention delivered in general practice to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour of patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (ENERGISED): rationale and study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Vetrovsky T, Kral N, Pfeiferova M, Kuhnova J, Novak J, Wahlich C BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):613.

PMID: 36997936 PMC: 10064755. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15513-1.


Effectiveness of physical activity interventions delivered or prompted by health professionals in primary care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Kettle V, Madigan C, Coombe A, Graham H, Thomas J, Chalkley A BMJ. 2022; 376:e068465.

PMID: 35197242 PMC: 8864760. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068465.


Effectiveness of physical activity monitors in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Larsen R, Wagner V, Korfitsen C, Keller C, Juhl C, Langberg H BMJ. 2022; 376:e068047.

PMID: 35082116 PMC: 8791066. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068047.


References
1.
Ding D, Lawson K, Kolbe-Alexander T, Finkelstein E, Katzmarzyk P, van Mechelen W . The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016; 388(10051):1311-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. View

2.
Mok A, Khaw K, Luben R, Wareham N, Brage S . Physical activity trajectories and mortality: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2019; 365:l2323. PMC: 6592407. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2323. View

3.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

4.
Besson H, Brage S, Jakes R, Ekelund U, Wareham N . Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 91(1):106-14. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28432. View

5.
van Sluijs E, Van Poppel M, Twisk J, van Mechelen W . Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.016. View