» Articles » PMID: 32139930

A Study of Effect of Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure of I-gel and ProSeal LMA in Children

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2020 Mar 7
PMID 32139930
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) should have good oropharyngeal seal pressures (OSP) for adequate ventilation and prevention of aspiration. Our aim was to study the effect of lateral position on OSP and thereby on ventilatory parameters for i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in children.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 86 children of ASA I-II, aged 1 month to 12 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia using i-gel or PLMA and requiring lateral position either for surgery or regional blocks were included. In both supine and lateral position OSP (constant flow method), expired tidal volume, fractional volume loss (%), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO) were noted. Intragroup and intergroup difference in OSP from supine to lateral position was analyzed using paired and unpaired -test respectively.

Results: In lateral position, there was a significant decrease in the OSP (cm HO) in both i-gel (supine: 21.94 ± 5.82, lateral: 15.54 ± 5.37) and PLMA (supine: 17.53 ± 5.05, lateral: 12.76 ± 3.37) groups ( = 0.000). Percentage reduction in OSP from supine to lateral with i-gel (28.14 ± 18.86) and PLMA (24.06 ± 19.75) were comparable ( = 0.339). With both i-gel and PLMA significant increase in fractional volume loss and ETCO were noted in lateral position. I-gel group had higher OSP compared to PLMA in supine ( = 0.001) and lateral position ( = 0.009).

Conclusion: In lateral position there was significant reduction in OSP compared to supine position with both i-gel and PLMA.

Citing Articles

Bronchial blocker through Proseal LMA - A useful approach for paediatric lung isolation.

Sarangi A, Singh S, Parab S Indian J Anaesth. 2022; 66(7):537-538.

PMID: 36111091 PMC: 9468992. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_63_22.


Effect of diffusion of anaesthetic gases on fibre-optic view change of laryngeal mask airway and post-operative laryngo-pharyngeal morbidity in children - A randomised controlled trial.

Bharti N, Bala I, Lokala R, Sahni N, Samujh R Indian J Anaesth. 2021; 65(9):644-649.

PMID: 34764498 PMC: 8577705. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_432_21.


Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.

Jindal S, Mittal A, Anand L, Singh M, Kapoor D Indian J Anaesth. 2021; 65(Suppl 1):S20-S26.

PMID: 33814586 PMC: 7993039. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1254_20.


Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study.

Sidhu G, Jindal S, Mahajan R, Bhagat S Indian J Anaesth. 2020; 64(8):675-680.

PMID: 32934401 PMC: 7457996. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_185_20.


Supraglottic airway devices: Placement and pharyngeal seal matters!.

Lal Solanki S, Johnson J, Samantaray A Indian J Anaesth. 2020; 64(8):649-652.

PMID: 32934398 PMC: 7457984. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_938_20.

References
1.
Maitra S, Baidya D, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P . Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014; 24(10):1072-9. DOI: 10.1111/pan.12483. View

2.
Hughes C, Place K, Berg S, Mason D . A clinical evaluation of the I-gel ™ supraglottic airway device in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22(8):765-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03893.x. View

3.
Saran S, Mishra S, Badhe A, Vasudevan A, Elakkumanan L, Mishra G . Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 30(2):195-8. PMC: 4009638. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.130013. View

4.
Smith P, Bailey C . A performance comparison of the paediatric i-gel with other supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia. 2014; 70(1):84-92. DOI: 10.1111/anae.12830. View

5.
Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R . Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999; 82(2):286-7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/82.2.286. View