» Articles » PMID: 32133146

Toxicological Effects of Ingested Nanocellulose in in Vitro Intestinal Epithelium and in Vivo Rat Models

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32133146
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cellulose is widely used as a thickener and filler in foods and drugs. It has been designated "generally regarded as safe" (GRAS). Nanocellulose (NC) has many additional potential applications designed to improve food quality and safety, but has not yet been designated as GRAS. Here we present results of toxicological studies of ingested NC in physiologically relevant and systems. studies employed a gastrointestinal tract simulator to digest two widely-used forms of NC, nanocellulose fibrils (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), at 0.75 and 1.5% w/w, in a fasting diet as well as in a standardized food model based on the average American diet. A triculture model of small intestinal epithelium was used to assess effects of a 24-hour incubation with the digested products (digesta) on cell layer integrity, cytotoxicity and oxidative stress. Other than a 10% increase over controls in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production with 1.5% w/w CNC, no significant changes in cytotoxicity, ROS or monolayer integrity were observed. toxicity was evaluated in rats gavaged twice weekly for five weeks with 1% w/w suspensions of CNF in either water or cream. Blood, serum, lung, liver, kidney, and small intestine were collected for analysis. No significant differences in hematology, serum markers or histology were observed between controls and rats given CNF suspensions. These findings suggest that ingested NC has little acute toxicity, and is likely non-hazardous when ingested in small quantities. Additional chronic feeding studies are required to assess long term effects, and potential detrimental effects on the gut microbiome and absorbance of essential micronutrients. These studies are underway, and their outcome will be reported in the near future.

Citing Articles

Ex vivo models for intestinal translocation studies of cellulose nanocrystals.

Muller M, Drexel R, Burkhart M, Dahnhardt-Pfeiffer S, Wien L, Herrmann C In Vitro Model. 2025; 2(5):181-194.

PMID: 39872170 PMC: 11756450. DOI: 10.1007/s44164-023-00056-x.


Evaluation of the cyto- and genotoxicity of two types of cellulose nanomaterials using human intestinal cells and in vitro digestion simulation.

Vital N, Cardoso M, Kranendonk M, Silva M, Louro H Arch Toxicol. 2024; 99(2):575-596.

PMID: 39718590 PMC: 11775080. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03911-2.


Toxicological Characteristics of Bacterial Nanocellulose in an In Vivo Experiment-Part 2: Immunological Endpoints, Influence on the Intestinal Barrier and Microbiome.

Shipelin V, Skiba E, Budaeva V, Shumakova A, Trushina E, Mustafina O Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39453014 PMC: 11510458. DOI: 10.3390/nano14201678.


Nanocellulose Composite Films in Food Packaging Materials: A Review.

Xu Y, Wu Z, Li A, Chen N, Rao J, Zeng Q Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38337312 PMC: 10856991. DOI: 10.3390/polym16030423.


Tackling the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cellulose nanofibers from the banana rachis: A new food packaging alternative.

Mejia-Jaramillo A, Gomez-Hoyos C, Canas Gutierrez A, Correa-Hincapie N, Zuluaga Gallego R, Triana-Chavez O Heliyon. 2023; 9(11):e21560.

PMID: 37954306 PMC: 10632726. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21560.


References
1.
Miousse I, Chalbot M, Pathak R, Lu X, Nzabarushimana E, Krager K . In Vitro Toxicity and Epigenotoxicity of Different Types of Ambient Particulate Matter. Toxicol Sci. 2015; 148(2):473-87. PMC: 5009441. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv200. View

2.
Lee J, Wang H, Pyrgiotakis G, DeLoid G, Zhang Z, Beltran-Huarac J . Analysis of lipid adsorption on nanoparticles by nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; 410(24):6155-6164. PMC: 6119100. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1145-0. View

3.
Setyawati M, Sevencan C, Bay B, Xie J, Zhang Y, Demokritou P . Nano-TiO Drives Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Intestinal Epithelial Cancer Cells. Small. 2018; 14(30):e1800922. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201800922. View

4.
Bhattacharya K, Kilic G, Costa P, Fadeel B . Cytotoxicity screening and cytokine profiling of nineteen nanomaterials enables hazard ranking and grouping based on inflammogenic potential. Nanotoxicology. 2017; 11(6):809-826. DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1363309. View

5.
Ma J, Mercer R, Barger M, Schwegler-Berry D, Cohen J, Demokritou P . Effects of amorphous silica coating on cerium oxide nanoparticles induced pulmonary responses. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015; 288(1):63-73. PMC: 4579046. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.07.012. View