» Articles » PMID: 32132919

Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns in Older Adults: Is It Mediated by Inhibition Processes?

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32132919
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study investigated the consequences of age-related decline in inhibition processes on intentional switching between bimanual coordination patterns. Fifteen young (24±2.8 years) and 20 older adults (69±5.3 years) performed Stroop tasks and bimanual coordination tasks. Stroop tasks included neutral, congruent, and incongruent conditions. Response time and error rate were measured. Bimanual coordination tasks consisted of performing in-phase (IP) and anti-phase (AP) patterns. Participants were requested to switch as quickly as possible from one pattern to the other, resulting in two different switching directions (AP to IP; IP to AP). Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the continuous relative phase (CRP) were calculated pre- and post-switching for each participant. Total switching time (TST) was measured. The switching phase was also decomposed into reaction time (RT) and reversal time (REvT). Pearson correlation analyses were performed to test for correlations between: (i) SD of CRP and response time in Stroop tasks, and (ii) switching times (TST, RT, RevT) and response time in Stroop task, respectively. In addition, parallel mediation analyses were conducted. Results showed that: (i) the AP pattern was less stable than the IP pattern in both young and older adults, (ii) coordination patterns were less stable in older adults, (iii) response times in Stroop task were longer in the incongruent condition, and (iv) RespTs were longer in older than in young participants, whatever the condition. In the bimanual coordination task, RT, RevT, and TST increased with age. The stability of the IP pattern was correlated with the response times observed in neutral and congruent conditions, while the stability of the AP pattern was correlated with response time observed in the incongruent condition. Correlation and mediation analyses showed that, in the AP to IP switching direction, RT and RevT were both significantly correlated with response times observed in the incongruent condition of Stroop task. These findings suggest that inhibition processes are involved in switching between bimanual coordination patterns, at least to trigger the early phase of switching. They also support the hypothesis that inhibition processes are more involved in maintaining the AP pattern and switching to the IP pattern. Finally, age-related changes in switching times seem to be prominently mediated by alterations of inhibition processes.

Citing Articles

Common and unique neurophysiological signatures for the stopping and revising of actions reveal the temporal dynamics of inhibitory control.

Hervault M, Wessel J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38948849 PMC: 11212930. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.18.597172.


Is an 8-Week Regimen of Nordic Walking Training Sufficient to Benefit Cognitive Performance in Healthy Older Adults? A Pilot Study.

Torre M, Carrubba C, Langeard A, Hugues N, Laurin J, Temprado J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592068 PMC: 10932334. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051235.


Mindfulness meditation and bimanual coordination control: study of acute effects and the mediating role of cognition.

Devillers-Reolon L, Temprado J, Sleimen-Malkoun R Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1162390.

PMID: 37255524 PMC: 10225655. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162390.


Intentional maintenance of antiphase bimanual pattern at transition frequency: Is it associated with inhibition processes?.

Sleimen-Malkoun R, Devillers-Reolon L, Temprado J Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e16089.

PMID: 37215926 PMC: 10196611. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16089.


Does bimanual coordination training benefit inhibitory function in older adults?.

Torre M, Langeard A, Alliou L, Temprado J Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1124109.

PMID: 37091520 PMC: 10116065. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1124109.


References
1.
Kelso J . Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367(1591):906-18. PMC: 3282307. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0351. View

2.
Serrien D, Bogaerts H, Suy E, Swinnen S . The identification of coordination constraints across planes of motion. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 128(1-2):250-5. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050845. View

3.
Langeard A, Houdeib R, Saillant K, Kaushal N, Lussier M, Bherer L . Switching Ability Mediates the Age-Related Difference in Timed Up and Go Performance. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019; 71(s1):S23-S28. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-181176. View

4.
Zanone P, Kelso J . Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(5):1454-80. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1454. View

5.
Davidson D, Zacks R, Williams C . Stroop interference, practice, and aging. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2007; 10(2):85-98. PMC: 1761647. DOI: 10.1076/anec.10.2.85.14463. View