» Articles » PMID: 32132915

Adaptive Tuning Curve Widths Improve Sample Efficient Learning

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32132915
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural brains perform miraculously well in learning new tasks from a small number of samples, whereas sample efficient learning is still a major open problem in the field of machine learning. Here, we raise the question, how the neural coding scheme affects sample efficiency, and make first progress on this question by proposing and analyzing a learning algorithm that uses a simple reinforce-type plasticity mechanism and does not require any gradients to learn low dimensional mappings. It harnesses three bio-plausible mechanisms, namely, population codes with bell shaped tuning curves, continous attractor mechanisms and probabilistic synapses, to achieve sample efficient learning. We show both theoretically and by simulations that population codes with broadly tuned neurons lead to high sample efficiency, whereas codes with sharply tuned neurons account for high final precision. Moreover, a dynamic adaptation of the tuning width during learning gives rise to both, high sample efficiency and high final precision. We prove a sample efficiency guarantee for our algorithm that lies within a logarithmic factor from the information theoretical optimum. Our simulations show that for low dimensional mappings, our learning algorithm achieves comparable sample efficiency to multi-layer perceptrons trained by gradient descent, although it does not use any gradients. Furthermore, it achieves competitive sample efficiency in low dimensional reinforcement learning tasks. From a machine learning perspective, these findings may inspire novel approaches to improve sample efficiency. From a neuroscience perspective, these findings suggest sample efficiency as a yet unstudied functional role of adaptive tuning curve width.

Citing Articles

Population codes enable learning from few examples by shaping inductive bias.

Bordelon B, Pehlevan C Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36524716 PMC: 9839349. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78606.

References
1.
Sompolinsky H . Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92(9):3844-8. PMC: 42058. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844. View

2.
ADRIAN E, ZOTTERMAN Y . The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings: Part 3. Impulses set up by Touch and Pressure. J Physiol. 1926; 61(4):465-83. PMC: 1514868. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1926.sp002308. View

3.
Skaggs W, Knierim J, Kudrimoti H, McNaughton B . A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 1995; 7:173-80. View

4.
Yaeli S, Meir R . Error-based analysis of optimal tuning functions explains phenomena observed in sensory neurons. Front Comput Neurosci. 2010; 4:130. PMC: 2978036. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00130. View

5.
Wilson H, Cowan J . A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik. 1973; 13(2):55-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288786. View