» Articles » PMID: 32132837

Kinematic Parameters of Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis and Their Inter- and Intra-Individual Variability

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32132837
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aims of the research were to (1) determine the values of kinematic parameters in two modifications of the topspin forehand stroke as well as the differences between them and (2) assess the inter-individual and intra-individual variability of the values. Two modifications of a topspin forehand were evaluated: topspin after a topspin ball (TF1) and topspin after a backspin ball (TF2). The MyoMotion Noraxon analysis system was used to record the kinematic data. A piezo-electric sensor was used to identify the moment when the ball made contact with the racket. The coefficient of variation determined the variability of the kinematic parameters. Most of the joint angles in four identified events reflected how the individual segments of a player's body should move. The difference in acceleration at the moment of contact between the two types of the topspin forehand was significant, but the variability of the acceleration values was small. Large variability in the angular parameters was found, and this result was considered a manifestation of different coordination patterns in the stroke movements. It is possible that even though the players used different methods of performing the movement, they obtained similar values for some parameters (e.g., acceleration), which should be taken into account by coaches. There were small differences in many parameters within individual players, which can indicate that a player performs tasks in a similar way each time. However, there was high variability in some angular parameters, indicating that the repetitions of particular strokes were not performed in an identical way. The reasons for this phenomenon include movement functionality and functional variability.

Citing Articles

Impacts of Racket Handle Design on Table Tennis Topspin Forehand Rally Performance Among Beginner Players.

Kumamoto R, Loh P, He Y, Ferlinghetti E, Lancini M, Uno T Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39852618 PMC: 11768881. DOI: 10.3390/sports13010022.


Kinematic parameters after tibial nonunion treatment using the Ilizarov method.

Pawik L, Fink-Lwow F, Kozlowska A, Szelerski L, Gorski R, Pawik M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):723.

PMID: 35902916 PMC: 9336091. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05683-1.


Lower Limb Biomechanics during the Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis: A Systemic Review.

He Y, Fekete G, Sun D, Baker J, Shao S, Gu Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(8).

PMID: 35892748 PMC: 9330838. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9080336.


Biomechanical Analysis of Different Footwork Foot Movements in Table Tennis.

Li X Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:9684535.

PMID: 35774440 PMC: 9239769. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9684535.


A Proposed Framework to Describe Movement Variability within Sporting Tasks: A Scoping Review.

Cowin J, Nimphius S, Fell J, Culhane P, Schmidt M Sports Med Open. 2022; 8(1):85.

PMID: 35759128 PMC: 9237196. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00473-4.


References
1.
Bankosz Z, Winiarski S . The Evaluation of Changes of Angles in Selected Joints During Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis. Motor Control. 2018; 22(3):314-337. DOI: 10.1123/mc.2017-0057. View

2.
Smeets J, Frens M, Brenner E . Throwing darts: timing is not the limiting factor. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 144(2):268-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1072-2. View

3.
Malagoli Lanzoni I, Bartolomei S, Di Michele R, Fantozzi S . A kinematic comparison between long-line and cross-court top spin forehand in competitive table tennis players. J Sports Sci. 2018; 36(23):2637-2643. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1456394. View

4.
Iino Y, Kojima T . Kinematics of table tennis topspin forehands: effects of performance level and ball spin. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27(12):1311-21. DOI: 10.1080/02640410903264458. View

5.
Dupuy M, Motte D, Ripoll H . The regulation of release parameters in underarm precision throwing. J Sports Sci. 2000; 18(6):375-82. DOI: 10.1080/02640410050074304. View