» Articles » PMID: 32132646

Active Inference Under Visuo-proprioceptive Conflict: Simulation and Empirical Results

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32132646
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been suggested that the brain controls hand movements via internal models that rely on visual and proprioceptive cues about the state of the hand. In active inference formulations of such models, the relative influence of each modality on action and perception is determined by how precise (reliable) it is expected to be. The 'top-down' affordance of expected precision to a particular sensory modality is associated with attention. Here, we asked whether increasing attention to (i.e., the precision of) vision or proprioception would enhance performance in a hand-target phase matching task, in which visual and proprioceptive cues about hand posture were incongruent. We show that in a simple simulated agent-based on predictive coding formulations of active inference-increasing the expected precision of vision or proprioception improved task performance (target matching with the seen or felt hand, respectively) under visuo-proprioceptive conflict. Moreover, we show that this formulation captured the behaviour and self-reported attentional allocation of human participants performing the same task in a virtual reality environment. Together, our results show that selective attention can balance the impact of (conflicting) visual and proprioceptive cues on action-rendering attention a key mechanism for a flexible body representation for action.

Citing Articles

Exploring the relationship between cardiac awareness and balance.

Salvato G, Bertolotti C, Sellitto M, Fazia T, Crivelli D, De Maio G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27451.

PMID: 39523416 PMC: 11551147. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79324-z.


The Many Roles of Precision in Action.

Limanowski J, Adams R, Kilner J, Parr T Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39330123 PMC: 11431491. DOI: 10.3390/e26090790.


Electrical analysis of logical complexity: an exploratory eeg study of logically valid/invalid deducive inference.

Salto F, Requena C, Alvarez-Merino P, Rodriguez V, Poza J, Hornero R Brain Inform. 2023; 10(1):13.

PMID: 37286855 PMC: 10247637. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00194-8.


Flexible intentions: An Active Inference theory.

Priorelli M, Stoianov I Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 17:1128694.

PMID: 37021085 PMC: 10067605. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1128694.


Positive Effect of Manipulated Virtual Kinematic Intervention in Individuals with Traumatic Stiff Shoulder: A Pilot Study.

Schwartz I, Safran O, Karniel N, Abel M, Berko A, Seyres M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35807205 PMC: 9267763. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133919.


References
1.
Wolpert D, Goodbody S, Husain M . Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 1(6):529-33. DOI: 10.1038/2245. View

2.
Kording K, Wolpert D . Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature. 2004; 427(6971):244-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature02169. View

3.
Kilner J, Friston K, Frith C . Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn Process. 2007; 8(3):159-66. PMC: 2649419. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2. View

4.
Shadmehr R, Krakauer J . A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 185(3):359-81. PMC: 2553854. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5. View

5.
Friston K . What is optimal about motor control?. Neuron. 2011; 72(3):488-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.018. View