» Articles » PMID: 32131863

Risk Factors for Metastasis and Poor Prognosis of Ewing Sarcoma: a Population Based Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Mar 6
PMID 32131863
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study is to determine the risk factors for metastasis of Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients in SEER database. Then explore clinicopathological factors associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, develop the nomogram to predict the probability of overall survival and cancer-specific survival METHODS: Thus, we collected clinicopathological data of ES patients in SEER database, and then used chi-square test and logistic regression to determine risk factors associated to metastasis. We also did survival analysis including Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazard model to explore the risk factors associated to overall survival and cancer-specific survival, and then developed the nomogram to visualize and quantify the probability of survival.

Results: After statistics, we find that patients with older ages (11-20 years old: OR = 1.517, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.033-2.228, p = 0.034; 21-30 years old: OR = 1.659. 95%CI 1.054-2.610, p = 0.029), larger tumor size (> 8 cm: OR = 1.914, 95%CI 1.251-2.928, p = 0.003), and pelvic lesions (OR = 2.492, 95%CI 1.829-3.395, p < 0.001) had a higher risk of metastasis. ROC curves showed higher AUC (0.65) of combined model which incorporate these three factors to predict the presence of metastasis at diagnosis. In survival analysis, patients with older ages (11-20 years: HR = 1.549, 95%CI 1.144-2.099, p = 0.005; 21-30 years: HR = 1.808, 95%CI 1.278-2.556, p = 0.001; 31-49 years: HR = 3.481, 95%CI 2.379-5.094, p < 0.001; ≥ 50 years: HR = 4.307, 95%CI 2.648-7.006, p < 0.001) , larger tumor size (5-8 cm: HR = 1.386, 95%CI 1.005-1.991, p = 0.046; > 8 cm: HR = 1.877, 95%CI 1.376-2.561, p < 0.001), black race (HR = 2.104, 95%CI 1.296-3.416, p = 0.003), and wider extension (regional: HR = 1.373, 95%CI 1.033-1.823, p = 0.029; metastatic: HR = 3.259, 95%CI 2.425-4.379, p < 0.001) were associated with worse prognosis. Chemotherapy was associated with better prognosis (HR = 0.466, 95%CI 0.290-0.685, p < 0.001). The nomogram which developed by training set and aimed to predict OS and CSS showed good consistency with actual observed outcomes internally and externally.

Conclusion: In conclusion, tumor size and primary site were associated with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Age, tumor size, primary site, tumor extent, and chemotherapy were associated with overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Nomogram could predict the probability of OS and CSS and showed good consistency with actual observed outcomes internally and externally.

Citing Articles

Characteristics and Outcome of Children and Adolescents Diagnosed With Ewing Sarcoma Treated at a Tertiary Cancer Center in India: A Single-Institution Experience.

Doctor C, Dave D, Trivedi M, Panchal H, Salunke A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77423.

PMID: 39949453 PMC: 11823279. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77423.


Prognostic Modeling for Bone Sarcomas Based on a Large Prospective Cohort From a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in India.

Bajpai J, Sarkar L, Rath S, Pawar A, Chandrashekharan A, Panda G JCO Glob Oncol. 2025; 11:e2400142.

PMID: 39913876 PMC: 11892611. DOI: 10.1200/GO.24.00142.


UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas.

Gerrand C, Amary F, Anwar H, Brennan B, Dileo P, Kalkat M Br J Cancer. 2024; 132(1):32-48.

PMID: 39550489 PMC: 11723950. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02868-4.


Prognostic factors and overall survival in pelvic Ewing's sarcoma and chordoma: A comparative SEER database analysis.

Tang W, Li R, Lai X, Yu X, He R Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37013.

PMID: 39286090 PMC: 11402751. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37013.


The development and external validation of a web-based nomogram for predicting overall survival with Ewing sarcoma in children.

Chen Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhan H, Liu J, Niu Y J Child Orthop. 2024; 18(2):236-245.

PMID: 38567041 PMC: 10984150. DOI: 10.1177/18632521241229963.


References
1.
Cash T, McIlvaine E, Krailo M, Lessnick S, Lawlor E, Laack N . Comparison of clinical features and outcomes in patients with extraskeletal versus skeletal localized Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016; 63(10):1771-9. PMC: 4995129. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26096. View

2.
Adamkova Krakorova D, Kubackova K, Dusek L, Tomas T, Janicek P, Tucek S . Advantages in Prognosis of Adult Patients with Ewing Sarcoma: 11-years Experiences and Current Treatment Management. Pathol Oncol Res. 2017; 24(3):623-630. DOI: 10.1007/s12253-017-0291-6. View

3.
Renzi S, Anderson N, Light N, Gupta A . Ewing-like sarcoma: An emerging family of round cell sarcomas. J Cell Physiol. 2018; 234(6):7999-8007. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27558. View

4.
Arpaci E, Yetisyigit T, Seker M, Uncu D, Uyeturk U, Oksuzoglu B . Prognostic factors and clinical outcome of patients with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors in adults: multicentric study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology. Med Oncol. 2013; 30(1):469. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0469-z. View

5.
Cotterill S, Ahrens S, Paulussen M, Jurgens H, VOUTE P, Gadner H . Prognostic factors in Ewing's tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(17):3108-14. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3108. View