» Articles » PMID: 32130457

[Traditional Vs. Modern: Possibilities and Limitations of the New Lecture Concept in ENT Teaching Curricula]

Overview
Journal HNO
Date 2020 Mar 5
PMID 32130457
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to steadily dwindling student attendance, a new blended learning lecture format was piloted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the University Medical Center Freiburg in the winter semester (WS) 2017/18: the ENT 3D series. In order to present complex ENT topics (e.g., middle ear) in a more understandable, appealing, and clinically relevant manner, the clinical disciplines of otorhinolaryngology and radiology cooperated with the preclinical specialty of anatomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate this teaching format and investigate preferences that could encourage students to attend lectures.

Methods: In all lectures, participants of the ENT block internship in the 2017/18 WS were asked about the quality of the lecture using an evaluation card. In addition, the increase in knowledge was examined in each of the newly designed lectures. A final questionnaire asked the students about their preferences regarding teaching methods.

Results: Overall, the new courses were not rated better than the regular ones, although the new concept was generally rated positively. It was not possible to attract more lecture attendees. However, the traditional teaching format "lecture" is still regarded as up to date by a defined group of students.

Conclusion: Despite a principally positive student assessment of a new lecture format, the 3D lectures did not achieve top marks in any category. This can be explained by the accumulation of unexpected student criticisms (quantity of the course content). Thus, the parameters intended as indicators (e-learning, quality of the course, use of modern teaching methods) could not fulfil their task. The result of the evaluation requires critical reflection and, if necessary, partial reorganization of the course (streamlining of content).

Citing Articles

[Interactive intraoperative annotation of surgical landmarks in student education to support learning efficiency and motivation].

van Bonn S, Grajek J, Schuldt T, Schraven S, Schneider A, Rettschlag S HNO. 2022; 70(8):609-617.

PMID: 35665824 PMC: 9166199. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01187-5.


[ToSkORL: self- and objective assessment of examination skills in the head and neck region].

Sharaf K, Felicio-Briegel A, Widmann M, Huber J, Eggersmann T, Stadlberger U HNO. 2021; 70(4):295-303.

PMID: 34622305 PMC: 8964619. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01097-y.


Digital teaching with interactive case presentations of ENT diseases - discussion of utilisation and motivation of students.

Vielsmeier V, Auerswald S, Marienhagen J, Keil S, Muller N GMS J Med Educ. 2020; 37(7):Doc100.

PMID: 33364379 PMC: 7740009. DOI: 10.3205/zma001393.


Evaluating the didactic value of 3D visualization in otosurgery.

Weiss N, Schneider A, Hempel J, Uecker F, van Bonn S, Schraven S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 278(4):1027-1033.

PMID: 32613353 PMC: 7954761. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06171-9.

References
1.
Scott K, Morris A, Marais B . Medical student use of digital learning resources. Clin Teach. 2017; 15(1):29-33. DOI: 10.1111/tct.12630. View

2.
Tolks D, Schafer C, Raupach T, Kruse L, Sarikas A, Gerhardt-Szep S . An Introduction to the Inverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions. GMS J Med Educ. 2016; 33(3):Doc46. PMC: 4894356. DOI: 10.3205/zma001045. View

3.
Chen F, Lui A, Martinelli S . A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ. 2017; 51(6):585-597. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13272. View

4.
Ikonne U, Campbell A, Whelihan K, Bay R, Lewis J . Exodus From the Classroom: Student Perceptions, Lecture Capture Technology, and the Inception of On-Demand Preclinical Medical Education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018; 118(12):813-823. DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.174. View

5.
Ruiz J, Mintzer M, Leipzig R . The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006; 81(3):207-12. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002. View