Comparison of Implant Stability Measurements Between a Resonance Frequency Analysis Device and a Modified Damping Capacity Analysis Device: an Study

Overview

Journal J Periodontal Implant Sci

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2020 Mar 5

PMID 32128274

Citations 11

Authors

Jungwon Lee

Se-Wook Pyo

Hyun-Jae Cho

Jung-Sub An

Jae-Hyun Lee

Ki-Tae Koo

Yong-Moo Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device.

Methods: Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was -6.76 (-25.05 to 11.53, <0.05).

Conclusions: Within the limits of studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions.

Citing Articles

Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: An in vitro study.

Lee J, Lim Y, Ahn J, Kim B, Baek Y, Lim B PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0290595.

PMID: 38776308 PMC: 11111012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290595.

Advancements in Methods of Classification and Measurement Used to Assess Tooth Mobility: A Narrative Review.

Kim G, Kim S, Chang J, Pyo S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202149 PMC: 10779763. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010142.

Tissue-engineered bone construct promotes early osseointegration of implants with low primary stability in oversized osteotomy.

Xu L, Jacobs R, Cao Y, Sun X, Qin X BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):69.

PMID: 38200461 PMC: 10782778. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03834-x.

Evaluation of Implant Stability According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Cohort Study.

Shim J, Kim M, An S, Kang E, Choi Y J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37568490 PMC: 10419881. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155087.

Relevant Aspects of the Dental Implant Design on the Insertion Torque, Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Micromobility: An In Vitro Study.

Herrero-Climent M, Falcao A, Tondela J, Brizuela A, Rios-Carrasco B, Gil J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769501 PMC: 9917810. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030855.

References

Lachmann S, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H . Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(1):75-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01173.x. View

Lages F, Douglas-de Oliveira D, Costa F . Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 20(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12565. View

Geckili O, Bilhan H, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C . A comparative in vitro evaluation of two different magnetic devices detecting the stability of osseo-integrated implants. J Periodontal Res. 2012; 47(4):508-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01462.x. View

Lee J, Lim J, Lee J, Kim S, Koo K, Seol Y . Efficacy of sonic-powered toothbrushes for plaque removal in patients with peri-implant mucositis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015; 45(2):56-61. PMC: 4415002. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.2.56. View

Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, Yilmaz B, Bilecenoglu B, Ozbek E . Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 11(1):52-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00095.x. View

Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P . Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7(3):261-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x. View

Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R . Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(3):525-30. View

Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P . Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33(4):824-830. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6285. View

Choi H, Chung C, Kim S, Son M . Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000000. View

10.

Oh J, Kim S, Lim S, Ong J . A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 107(4):513-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.026. View

11.

Jaramillo R, Santos R, Lazaro P, Romero M, Rios-Santos J, Bullon P . Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(3):351-6. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000072. View

12.

Marquezan M, Osorio A, SantAnna E, Souza M, Maia L . Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(7):767-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x. View

13.

Brizuela-Velasco A, Alvarez-Arenal A, Gil-Mur F, Herrero-Climent M, Chavarri-Prado D, Chento-Valiente Y . Relationship Between Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Measurements, Performed by Resonance Frequency Analysis, in Micromobility of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study. Implant Dent. 2015; 24(5):607-11. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000318. View

14.

Santamaria-Arrieta G, Brizuela-Velasco A, Fernandez-Gonzalez F, Chavarri-Prado D, Chento-Valiente Y, Solaberrieta E . Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8(3):e307-11. PMC: 4930641. DOI: 10.4317/jced.52873. View

15.

Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker B . Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(3):308-312. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12598. View

16.

Lachmann S, Laval J, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M . Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(1):80-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01174.x. View

17.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

18.

Han H, Lim H, Hong J, Ahn S, Han J, Shin S . Primary implant stability in a bone model simulating clinical situations for the posterior maxilla: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016; 46(4):254-65. PMC: 5005813. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.254. View

19.

Bilhan H, Cilingir A, Bural C, Bilmenoglu C, Sakar O, Geckili O . The Evaluation of the Reliability of Periotest for Implant Stability Measurements: An In Vitro Study. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 41(4):e90-5. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00303. View

20.

Atsumi M, Park S, Wang H . Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(5):743-54. View