» Articles » PMID: 32126097

Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission Among Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Mar 4
PMID 32126097
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The risk stratification of patients in the emergency department begins at triage. It is vital to stratify patients early based on their severity, since undertriage can lead to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. Our aim was to present a new approach to assist healthcare professionals at triage in the stratification of patients and in identifying those with higher risk of ICU admission. Adult patients assigned Manchester Triage System (MTS) or Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 1 to 3 from a Portuguese and a United States Emergency Departments were analyzed. Variables routinely collected at triage were used and natural language processing was applied to the patient chief complaint. Stratified random sampling was applied to split the data in train (70%) and test (30%) sets and 10-fold cross validation was performed for model training. Logistic regression, random forests, and a random undersampling boosting algorithm were used. We compared the performance obtained with the reference model-using only triage priorities-with the models using additional variables. For both hospitals, a logistic regression model achieved higher overall performance, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.27-0.33) for the United States hospital and of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83-0.86) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.05-0.07) for the Portuguese hospital. Heart rate, pulse oximetry, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure were the most important predictors of ICU admission. Compared to the reference models, the models using clinical variables and the chief complaint presented higher recall for patients assigned MTS/ESI 3 and can identify patients assigned MTS/ESI 3 who are at risk for ICU admission.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Syncope Severity in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Analysis.

Martinez-Licort R, Sahelices B, De La Torre I, Vegas J Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70477.

PMID: 39995795 PMC: 11847648. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70477.


Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.

Siira E, Johansson H, Nygren J J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e53741.

PMID: 39913918 PMC: 11843066. DOI: 10.2196/53741.


Key Concepts in Machine Learning and Clinical Applications in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Sarma D, Rali A, Jentzer J Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025; 27(1):30.

PMID: 39831916 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02149-9.


Using machine learning and natural language processing in triage for prediction of clinical disposition in the emergency department.

Chang Y, Lin Y, Huang F, Chen D, Chung Y, Chen W BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):237.

PMID: 39695961 PMC: 11657801. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01152-1.


Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.

Porto B BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):219.

PMID: 39558255 PMC: 11575054. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01135-2.


References
1.
Coslovsky M, Takala J, Exadaktylos A, Martinolli L, Merz T . A clinical prediction model to identify patients at high risk of death in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(6):1029-36. PMC: 4477719. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3737-x. View

2.
Cameron A, Rodgers K, Ireland A, Jamdar R, McKay G . A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage. Emerg Med J. 2014; 32(3):174-9. PMC: 4345772. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203200. View

3.
Levin S, Toerper M, Hamrock E, Hinson J, Barnes S, Gardner H . Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 71(5):565-574.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.005. View

4.
Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi M, Brown D, Camargo Jr C, Hasegawa K . Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):64. PMC: 6387562. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7. View

5.
Azeez D, Gan K, Ali M, Ismail M . Secondary triage classification using an ensemble random forest technique. Technol Health Care. 2015; 23(4):419-28. DOI: 10.3233/THC-150907. View