» Articles » PMID: 32124514

CALIBER: a Phase II Randomized Feasibility Trial of Chemoablation with Mitomycin-C Vs Surgical Management in Low-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the activity of intravesical mitomycin-C (MMC) to ablate recurrent low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and assess whether it may enable patients to avoid surgical intervention for treatment of recurrence.

Patients And Methods: CALIBER is a phase II feasibility study. Participants were randomized (2:1) to treatment with four once-weekly MMC 40-mg intravesical instillations (chemoablation arm) or to surgical management. The surgical group was included to assess the feasibility of randomization. The primary endpoint was complete response to intravesical MMC in the chemoablation arm at 3 months, reported with exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary endpoints included time to subsequent recurrence, summarized by Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results: Between February 2015 and August 2017, 82 patients with visual diagnosis of recurrent low-risk NMIBC were enrolled from 24 UK hospitals (chemoablation, n = 54; surgical management, n =28). The median follow-up was 24 months. Complete response at 3 months was 37.0% (20/54; 95% CI 24.3-51.3) with chemoablation and 80.8% (21/26; 95% CI 60.6-93.4) with surgical management. Amongst patients with complete response at 3 months, a similar proportion was recurrence-free by 12 months in both groups (84%). Amongst those with residual disease at 3 months, the 12-month recurrence-free proportion was lower in the surgical management group (40.0%) than in the chemoablation group (84%). Recruitment stopped early as chemoablation did not meet the prespecified threshold of 45% complete responses at 3 months.

Conclusion: Intravesical chemoablation in low-risk NMIBC is feasible and safe, but did not demonstrate sufficient response in the present trial. After chemoablation there may be a reduction in recurrence rate, even in non-responders, that is greater than with surgery alone. Further research is required to investigate the role and optimal schedule of neoadjuvant intravesical chemotherapy prior to surgery for NMIBC.

Citing Articles

Comparisons of Intravesical Treatments with Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine, and Docetaxel for Recurrence and Progression of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Matloubieh J, Hanelin D, Agalliu I Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766024 PMC: 11674742. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244125.


Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes and Patient Experience Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.

Sepehri S, Rezaee M, Su Z, Kates M Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 26(1):13.

PMID: 39390270 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01243-3.


Chemoablation with UGN-102 in intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, are we there yet?.

Gonzalez-Padilla D, Subiela J, Villacampa-Auba F Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(4):639-642.

PMID: 38721284 PMC: 11074683. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-563.


Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group.

Kamat A, Apolo A, Babjuk M, Bivalacqua T, Black P, Buckley R J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(35):5437-5447.

PMID: 37793077 PMC: 10713193. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.00307.


Diagnosis, treatment and survival from bladder, upper urinary tract, and urethral cancers: real-world findings from NHS England between 2013 and 2019.

Catto J, Mandrik O, Quayle L, Hussain S, McGrath J, Cresswell J BJU Int. 2023; 131(6):734-744.

PMID: 36680312 PMC: 10952282. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15970.


References
1.
Boustead G, Fowler S, Swamy R, Kocklebergh R, Hounsome L . Stage, grade and pathological characteristics of bladder cancer in the UK: British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) urological tumour registry. BJU Int. 2014; 113(6):924-30. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12468. View

2.
Simon R . Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9. View

3.
Svatek R, Hollenbeck B, Holmang S, Lee R, Kim S, Stenzl A . The economics of bladder cancer: costs and considerations of caring for this disease. Eur Urol. 2014; 66(2):253-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.006. View

4.
Gofrit O, Zorn K, Shikanov S, Steinberg G . Marker lesion experiments in bladder cancer--what have we learned?. J Urol. 2010; 183(5):1678-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.104. View

5.
Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. View