» Articles » PMID: 32124032

Accuracy of Tibial Positioning in the Frontal Plane: a Prospective Study Comparing Conventional and Innovative Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2020 Mar 4
PMID 32124032
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers.

Methods: In a prospective study, 300 patients were allocated to four different groups using a randomization process (two innovative and two conventional) techniques of tibial instrumentation (conventional: extramedullary, intramedullary; innovative: navigation and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI); n = 75 for each group). The aims were to reconstruct the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) to 90° and the mechanical tibio-femoral axis (mTFA) to 0°. Both angles were evaluated and compared between all groups three months after the surgery. Patients who presented with a postoperative mTFA > 3° were classified as outliers.

Results: The navigation and intramedullary technique both demonstrated that they were significantly more precise in reconstructing a neutral mTFA and MPTA compared to the other two techniques. The odd's ratio (OR) for producing outliers was highest for the PSI method (PSI OR = 5.5, p < 0.05; extramedullary positioning OR = 3.7, p > 0.05; intramedullary positioning OR = 1.7, p > 0.05; navigation OR = 0.04, p < 0.05). We could only observe significant differences between pre- and postoperative MPTA in the navigation and intramedullary group. The MPTA showed a significant negative correlation with the mTFA in all groups preoperatively and in the extramedullary, intramedullary and PSI postoperatively.

Conclusion: The navigation and intramedullary instrumentation provided the precise positioning of the tibial component. Outliers were most common within the PSI and extramedullary technique. Optimal alignment is dependent on the technique of tibial instrumentation and tibial component positioning determines the accuracy in TKA since mTFA correlated with MPTA pre- and postoperatively.

Citing Articles

The Alignment of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is a Technology-Assisted System Better Than Conventional Instrumentation?.

Hernandez-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Roncero-Gonzalez S Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54745.

PMID: 38524042 PMC: 10960967. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54745.


Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques.

Migliorini F, Feierabend M, Hofmann U J Healthc Leadersh. 2023; 15:327-338.

PMID: 38020721 PMC: 10676205. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S383916.


Customized-individually-made origin® implants in total knee arthroplasty allow a reliable solution for accurate reproduction of planned implant positioning.

Sajan M, Moussa M, Lefevre N, Payan C, Valentin E, Meyer A J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):123.

PMID: 38015319 PMC: 10684845. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00706-9.


Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Tibesku C, Haas S, Saunders C, Harwood D Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(7):4379-4393.

PMID: 36449066 PMC: 10293358. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04698-6.


Increasing grades of frontal deformities in knee osteoarthritis are not associated with ligamentous ankle instabilities.

Graef F, Ruhling M, Gwinner C, Hommel H, Tsitsilonis S, Perka C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 31(5):1704-1713.

PMID: 35666304 PMC: 10090006. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07021-3.


References
1.
Kim Y, Park J, Kim J, Park S . The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):379-85. PMC: 3923934. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9. View

2.
Li Z, Esposito C, Koch C, Lee Y, Padgett D, Wright T . Polyethylene Damage Increases With Varus Implant Alignment in Posterior-stabilized and Constrained Condylar Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(12):2981-2991. PMC: 5670063. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5477-4. View

3.
Srivastava A, Lee G, Steklov N, Colwell Jr C, Ezzet K, DLima D . Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2011; 19(5):560-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.11.003. View

4.
Zeng H, Ying X, Chen G, Yang X, Lin D, Li Z . Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015; 70(10):714-9. PMC: 4602384. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(10)10. View

5.
Woon J, Zeng I, Calliess T, Windhagen H, Ettinger M, Waterson H . Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018; 138(9):1293-1303. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2988-8. View