» Articles » PMID: 32124008

Isometric-based EMG Threshold in Girls and Women

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2020 Mar 4
PMID 32124008
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The electromyographic threshold (EMG) has been suggested to indicate the onset of accelerated higher-threshold (type-II) MU recruitment. Previous research has demonstrated that boys' EMG occurs at higher relative exercise intensities than men's in both cycling- and isometric-based testing. Girls‒women EMG differences were demonstrated only in cycling, but findings were clouded by low EMG-detection rates in women (68%) and particularly in girls (45%) PURPOSE: To examine the EMG, in girls and women, using the same males-employed isometric-based test protocol, and compare the females' findings with those previously obtained in the males.

Methods: Seventeen girls and 17 women had their EMG determined as well as their one-repetition-maximum isometric knee-extension strength (1RM). Vastus-lateralis sEMG root mean square was recorded and the EMG was defined as the exercise intensity (%1RM) at the bi-segmental point of the least sum of squares.

Results: EMG was detected in 88.2% of girls and 94.1% of women and occurred at higher relative intensities in the girls than in women (56.0 ± 11.1 vs. 47.7 ± 8.0% 1RM). The girls' 1RM (normalized to lean body mass) was only 69.1% that of the women.

Conclusions: Girls' EMG values are higher compared with women's, possibly reflecting lower ability to activate higher-threshold (type-II) motor units. The females' EMG and detection-rate values were similar to the corresponding values previously observed in males. The females' age-related difference in the recruitment of higher-threshold motor units, as reflected by the EMG, appears to be on par with the males.

Citing Articles

Optimization of post-activation potentiation in girls and women.

McKiel A, Woods S, Faragher M, Taylor G, Vandenboom R, Falk B Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(9):2737-2747.

PMID: 38652270 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05475-6.


Different discrete motor-unit activation patterns in the flexor carpi radialis in boys and men.

Woods S, McKiel A, Herda T, Klentrou P, Holmes M, Gabriel D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(6):1933-1942.

PMID: 38285213 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05417-2.


Post-activation potentiation and potentiated motor unit firing patterns in boys and men.

McKiel A, Woods S, Gabriel D, Vandenboom R, Falk B Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(5):1561-1574.

PMID: 38159138 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05377-z.


Boys-men mean-power-frequency differences in progressive exercise to exhaustion, confounded by variability and adiposity.

Dotan R, Woods S, Langille J, Falk B Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(2):491-505.

PMID: 37553549 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05292-3.


Differences in time to task failure and fatigability between children and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Souron R, Carayol M, Martin V, Piponnier E, Duche P, Gruet M Front Physiol. 2022; 13:1026012.

PMID: 36388129 PMC: 9661393. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1026012.


References
1.
Taylor A, Bronks R . Effect of acute normobaric hypoxia on quadriceps integrated electromyogram and blood metabolites during incremental exercise to exhaustion. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996; 73(1-2):121-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00262820. View

2.
Hug F, Decherchi P, Marqueste T, Jammes Y . EMG versus oxygen uptake during cycling exercise in trained and untrained subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14(2):187-95. DOI: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00081-6. View

3.
Seger J, Thorstensson A . Muscle strength and electromyogram in boys and girls followed through puberty. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999; 81(1-2):54-61. DOI: 10.1007/PL00013797. View

4.
Hug F, Laplaud D, Lucia A, Grelot L . EMG threshold determination in eight lower limb muscles during cycling exercise: a pilot study. Int J Sports Med. 2006; 27(6):456-62. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865787. View

5.
Maestu J, Cicchella A, Purge P, Ruosi S, Jurimae J, Jurimae T . Electromyographic and neuromuscular fatigue thresholds as concepts of fatigue. J Strength Cond Res. 2006; 20(4):824-8. DOI: 10.1519/R-18275.1. View