» Articles » PMID: 32119697

Correlation Between Histogram-based DCE-MRI Parameters and 18F-FDG PET Values in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation in Primary Tumors and Metastatic Nodes

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the correlation between histogram-based Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters and positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG-PET) values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), both in primary tumors (PTs) and in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs).

Methods: 52 patients with a new pathologically-confirmed OPSCC were included in the present retrospective cohort study. Imaging including DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were acquired in all patients. Both PTs and the largest LN, if present, were volumetrically contoured. Quantitative parameters, including the transfer constants, Ktrans and Kep, and the volume of extravascular extracellular space, ve, were calculated from DCE-MRI. The percentiles (P), P10, P25, P50, P75, P90, and skewness, kurtosis and entropy were obtained from the histogram-based analysis of each perfusion parameter. Standardized uptake values (SUV), SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated applying a SUV threshold of 40%. The correlations between all variables were investigated with the Spearman-rank correlation test. To exclude false positive results under multiple testing, the Benjamini-Hockberg procedure was applied.

Results: No significant correlations were found between any parameters in PTs, while significant associations emerged between Ktrans and 18F-FDG PET parameters in LNs.

Conclusions: Evident relationships emerged between DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET parameters in OPSCC LNs, while no association was found in PTs. The complex relationships between perfusion and metabolic biomarkers should be interpreted separately for primary tumors and lymph-nodes. A multiparametric approach to analyze PTs and LNs before treatment is advisable in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Citing Articles

MRI for Differentiation between HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Chen L, Lauwers I, Verduijn G, Philippens M, Gahrmann R, Capala M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893224 PMC: 11171338. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112105.


Prediction of pathological complete response in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy using volumetric multisequence MRI histogram analysis.

Liu H, Zhu C, Wang X, Chen X, Li Z, Xian J Neuroradiology. 2024; 66(6):919-929.

PMID: 38503986 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03339-6.


Multiparametric MRI Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. A Mono-Institutional Study.

Piludu F, Marzi S, Gangemi E, Farneti A, Marucci L, Venuti A J Clin Med. 2021; 10(17).

PMID: 34501313 PMC: 8432241. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173865.


Application of Community Detection Algorithm to Investigate the Correlation between Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Metabolism, Hypoxia, Cellularity, and Perfusion for Precision Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Paudyal R, Grkovski M, Oh J, Schoder H, Aramburu Nunez D, Hatzoglou V Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(15).

PMID: 34359810 PMC: 8345739. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153908.

References
1.
Norikane T, Yamamoto Y, Maeda Y, Kudomi N, Matsunaga T, Haba R . Correlation of (18)F-fluoromisonidazole PET findings with HIF-1α and p53 expressions in head and neck cancer: comparison with (18)F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2013; 35(1):30-5. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000010. View

2.
Kroenke M, Hirata K, Gafita A, Watanabe S, Okamoto S, Magota K . Voxel based comparison and texture analysis of 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO PET of patients with head-and-neck cancer. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0213111. PMC: 6394953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213111. View

3.
Shen G, Ma H, Liu B, Ren P, Kuang A . Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and the standardized uptake value in neoplastic lesions: a meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2017; 38(12):1076-1084. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000746. View

4.
Ferlay J, Shin H, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin D . Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2011; 127(12):2893-917. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25516. View

5.
Surov A, Meyer H, Wienke A . Can Imaging Parameters Provide Information Regarding Histopathology in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Meta-Analysis. Transl Oncol. 2018; 11(2):498-503. PMC: 5884190. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.004. View