» Articles » PMID: 32113293

Identifying Cues for Tone-in-noise Detection Using Decision Variable Correlation in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus Undulatus)

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2020 Mar 2
PMID 32113293
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies evaluated cues for masked tone detection using reproducible noise waveforms. Human results founded on this approach suggest that tone detection is based on combined energy and envelope (ENV) cues, but detection cues in nonhuman species are less clear. Decision variable correlation (DVC) was used to evaluate tone-in-noise detection cues in the budgerigar, an avian species with human-like behavioral sensitivity to many complex sounds. DVC quantifies a model's ability to predict trial-by-trial variance in behavioral responses. Budgerigars were behaviorally conditioned to detect 500-Hz tones in wideband (WB; 100-3000 Hz) and narrowband (NB; 452-552 Hz) noise. Behavioral responses were obtained using a single-interval, two-alternative discrimination task and two-down, one-up adaptive tracking procedures. Tone-detection thresholds in WB noise were higher than human thresholds, putatively due to broader peripheral frequency tuning, whereas NB thresholds were within ∼1 dB of human results. Budgerigar average hit and false-alarm rates across noise waveforms were consistent, highly correlated across subjects, and correlated to human results. Trial-by-trial behavioral results in NB noise were best explained by a model combining energy and ENV cues. In contrast, WB results were better predicted by ENV-based or multiple-channel energy detector models. These results suggest that budgerigars and humans use similar cues for tone-in-noise detection.

Citing Articles

Normal behavioral discrimination of envelope statistics in budgerigars with kainate-induced cochlear synaptopathy.

Henry K, Guo A, Abrams K Hear Res. 2023; 441:108927.

PMID: 38096707 PMC: 10775186. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108927.


Histological Correlates of Auditory Nerve Injury from Kainic Acid in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Wang Y, Abrams K, Youngman M, Henry K J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023; 24(5):473-485.

PMID: 37798548 PMC: 10695905. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00910-5.


Mechanisms of masking by Schroeder-phase harmonic tone complexes in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Henry K, Wang Y, Abrams K, Carney L Hear Res. 2023; 435:108812.

PMID: 37269601 PMC: 10330901. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108812.


Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?.

Henry K Mol Cell Neurosci. 2021; 118:103692.

PMID: 34883241 PMC: 8928575. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2021.103692.


Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.

Wang Y, Abrams K, Carney L, Henry K J Neurosci. 2021; 41(34):7206-7223.

PMID: 34266898 PMC: 8387112. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3103-20.2021.


References
1.
Dooling R, Saunders J . Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1975; 88(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1037/h0076226. View

2.
Yost W, Shofner W . Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(1):315-23. PMC: 2719489. DOI: 10.1121/1.3037232. View

3.
Henry K, Amburgey K, Abrams K, Idrobo F, Carney L . Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 142(4):2073. PMC: 5640449. DOI: 10.1121/1.5006912. View

4.
Niemiec A, Yost W, Shofner W . Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 92(5):2636-49. DOI: 10.1121/1.404380. View

5.
Johnson D . The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 68(4):1115-22. DOI: 10.1121/1.384982. View