» Articles » PMID: 32112227

Acetabular Defect Classification and Management : Revision Arthroplasty of the Acetabular Cup Based on 3-point Fixation

Overview
Journal Orthopade
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Mar 1
PMID 32112227
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to provide a practicable and contemporary classification system that is reliable and pragmatic with respect to perioperative evaluation, planning, scientific comparison and analysis.

Material And Methods: This was a retrospective study of 160 patients who underwent acetabular revision surgery after THR due to loosening of the acetabular cup. The assessment of the acetabular defect was based on intraoperative description of the bony configuration of the acetabulum as well as on standardized preoperative planning images (pelvic overview and axial view of the hip joint). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was carried out in individual cases.

Results: Acetabular bone defects were classified into 4 types based on whether or not a 3-point fixation of the acetabular cup within the boundaries of the acetabular cavity was possible. Minor segmental defects or cup loosening without bone loss can be treated with standard hemispherical acetabular components. Bone loss can be filled with bone grafts and/or treated by the appropriate acetabular component in order to ensure stable anchorage. When conventional revision cups are no longer suitable a custom made partial pelvic replacement can be used.

Conclusion: The proposed classification mainly relies on intraoperative findings which were confirmed by preoperative imaging in 154 cases out of 160 (96.25%); however, meticulous preoperative planning based on X‑ray radiographs must be carried out. In addition, a CT scan must be performed whenever type III or type IV defects are anticipated. Compared to the existing classification systems, we can state that our classification system is practicable and pragmatic and simplifies the assessment of bone defects.

Citing Articles

The Use of Porous Titanium Metal Augments for Acetabular Defects in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Initial Results From a Single-Center Experience.

Jovanovic Z, Vukomanovic B, Aleksandric D, Jeremic D, Miceta L, Zarkovic N Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77307.

PMID: 39935914 PMC: 11811741. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77307.


Statistical shape models quantify acetabular defects in hip revision surgery: implications for classification and surgical planning.

Wang J, Guo F, Yang Q, Sun K, Yuan K, Zhang X Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):45.

PMID: 39680206 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5.


Application of Intraoperative Individualized Cup Combination-Cup-on-Cup Technique in Severe Acetabular Defects.

Li W, Liu D, Liu X, Li X Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(11):2853-2861.

PMID: 39311082 PMC: 11541136. DOI: 10.1111/os.14248.


Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement: a narrative literature review.

Pandey A, Zuke W, Surace P, Kamath A Ann Jt. 2024; 9:21.

PMID: 38694811 PMC: 11061657. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-23-23.


Total Hip Arthroplasty in Neglected Acetabular Fracture with Pipkin Type 4 Femoral Head Fracture. A Case Report.

Agrawal A, Rai B, Rai A, Sakale H, Garg A J Orthop Case Rep. 2023; 13(11):162-166.

PMID: 38025366 PMC: 10664229. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i11.4046.


References
1.
Campbell D, Garbuz D, Masri B, Duncan C . Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(1):83-6. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.19157. View

2.
Wassilew G, Janz V, Perka C, Muller M . [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system]. Orthopade. 2017; 46(2):148-157. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3381-3. View

3.
Paprosky W, Perona P, Lawrence J . Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9(1):33-44. DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x. View

4.
Gollwitzer H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Holzapfel B, Gradinger R . [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component]. Chirurg. 2010; 81(4):284-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1845-2. View

5.
Bettin D, Katthagen B . [The German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997; 135(4):281-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039389. View