» Articles » PMID: 32110217

Ganglion Impar Neurolysis in the Management of Pelvic and Perineal Cancer-Related Pain

Overview
Journal Case Rep Oncol
Publisher Karger
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Feb 29
PMID 32110217
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer-related pain is a very prevalent problem in all stages, with 10% of patients requiring invasive techniques for adequate pain management. Ganglion impar neurolysis has been used in the treatment of pelvic-perineal pain with efficacy and rare complications, but only a few case or series reports in cancer patients have been published. We report the case of a patient presenting with an ovarian carcinoma (FIGO stage IIIC), who had several disease relapses at the colorectal transition and need for palliative colic prosthesis. She presented later with anorectal pain associated with a rectovaginal fistula, which had an important impact on the activities of her daily life. She was submitted to two ganglion impar neurolyses, which resulted in improved pain control for a total of 5 months, an important improvement in her quality of life, and reduction of opioid consumption. The authors aim to alert to the importance of pain control and to address the fourth step of the WHO analgesic ladder as an option for cancer patients, including palliative patients.

Citing Articles

Ganglion Impar Neurolysis to Treat Refractory Chronic Pain From Vulvar Cancer: A Case Report.

Akinwamide O, Syed A, Mehta J, Andrawis M, Zhang H Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e70128.

PMID: 39463516 PMC: 11502220. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70128.


Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study.

Sencan S, Yolcu G, Bilim S, Kenis-Coskun O, Gunduz O Korean J Pain. 2021; 35(1):106-113.

PMID: 34966017 PMC: 8728552. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106.

References
1.
Sindt J, Brogan S . Interventional Treatments of Cancer Pain. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016; 34(2):317-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.01.004. View

2.
Scott-Warren J, Hill V, Rajasekaran A . Ganglion impar blockade: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012; 17(1):306. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-012-0306-7. View

3.
Agarwal-Kozlowski K, Lorke D, Habermann C, Am Esch J, Beck H . CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy. Clin J Pain. 2009; 25(7):570-6. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a5f5c7. View

4.
Gunduz O, Kenis-Coskun O . Ganglion blocks as a treatment of pain: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2017; 10:2815-2826. PMC: 5734237. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S134775. View

5.
Toshniwal G, Dureja G, Prashanth S . Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar block for management of chronic perineal pain: a prospective observational study. Pain Physician. 2007; 10(5):661-6. View