Implant-supported Fixed Hybrid Acrylic Complete Dentures Opposing Fully Restored Mandibular Metal Ceramic Restorations

Overview

Journal BMJ Case Rep

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2020 Feb 29

PMID 32107260

Citations 2

Authors

Mohammed A Alfarsi

Sharaz Shaik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This report presents a full-mouth rehabilitation case. A patient came with a failing dentition in maxilla, and after the treatment, the patient had a shortened full-arch, implant-supported, screw-retained hybrid acrylic complete denture in the maxilla and full-arch metal ceramic restorations in the mandible. The report describes the steps involved in the prosthodontic rehabilitation; a cost-effective treatment plan, the restoration of vertical dimension, an immediate denture, an implant-level impression, a verified-master cast, the fabrication of definitive prosthesis, the occlusal scheme and multiple follow-ups in 6 months. We discussed the merits/demerits of screw-retained prosthesis, impression techniques and various types of fixed complete dentures. We learnt the difficulty in hygiene measures and dissatisfaction of the patient with the hygienic gaps under the acrylic fixed dentures.

Citing Articles

Hybrid Prosthesis versus Overdenture: Effect of BioHPP Prosthetic Design Rehabilitating Edentulous Mandible.

Al-Asad H, El Afandy M, Mohamed H, Mohamed M Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:4108679.

PMID: 37426766 PMC: 10325880. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4108679.

Four narrow dental implants and conventionally cast bar-supported removable hybrid acrylic complete denture as a therapeutic modality for terminal dentition.

Alfarsi M, Shaik S Clin Case Rep. 2021; 9(1):326-336.

PMID: 33489180 PMC: 7813059. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3525.

References

Michalakis K, Hirayama H, Garefis P . Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18(5):719-28. View

Rilo B, Da Silva J, Mora M, Santana U . Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review. Int Dent J. 2008; 58(3):139-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00189.x. View

Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Menini M, Ravera G, Drago C . Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99(5):351-60. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60082-7. View

Witter D, van Palenstein Helderman W, Creugers N, Kayser A . The shortened dental arch concept and its implications for oral health care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999; 27(4):249-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb02018.x. View

Brignardello-Petersen R . High survival of implants and fixed complete dentures after 3 years, regardless of material used to fabricate the implant-supported fixed complete denture. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019; 150(9):e128. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.04.018. View

Agliardi E, Tete S, Romeo D, Malchiodi L, Gherlone E . Immediate function of partial fixed rehabilitation with axial and tilted implants having intrasinus insertion. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(3):851-5. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000959. View

Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A . Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(2):216-22. View

Ekfeldt A, Oilo G . Occlusal contact wear of prosthodontic materials. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1988; 46(3):159-69. DOI: 10.3109/00016358809004762. View

Henry P . Tooth loss and implant replacement. Aust Dent J. 2000; 45(3):150-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00552.x. View

10.

Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J . The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(4):565-577. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12769. View

11.

Branemark P, Hansson B, Adell R, BREINE U, Lindstrom J, HALLEN O . Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977; 16:1-132. View

12.

Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G . A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13(3):260-73. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130305.x. View

13.

Wittneben J, Millen C, Bragger U . Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:84-98. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1. View

14.

Gherlone E, Sannino G, Rapanelli A, Crespi R, Gastaldi G, Cappare P . Prefabricated Bar System for Immediate Loading in Edentulous Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Prospective Longitudinal Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:7352125. PMC: 5848148. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7352125. View

15.

Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F . Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(5). PMC: 6427545. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050829. View

16.

Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G . An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(5):470-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015. View

17.

Lopes A, Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Sanchez-Fernandez E, Gravito I . The NobelGuide All-on-4 Treatment Concept for Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: A Retrospective Report on the 7-Years Clinical and 5-Years Radiographic Outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 19(2):233-244. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12456. View