» Articles » PMID: 32106845

Delirium Misdiagnosis Risk in Psychiatry: a Machine Learning-logistic Regression Predictive Algorithm

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Feb 29
PMID 32106845
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Delirium is a frequent diagnosis made by Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP). Numerous studies have demonstrated misdiagnosis prior to referral to CLP. Few studies have considered the factors underlying misdiagnosis using multivariate approaches.

Objectives: To determine the number of cases referred to CLP, which are misdiagnosed at time of referral, to build an accurate predictive classifier algorithm, using input variables related to delirium misdiagnosis.

Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted at Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, collecting data from a record of all patients seen by CLP for a period of 5 months. Data was collected pertaining to putative factors underlying misdiagnosis. A Machine Learning-Logistic Regression classifier model was built, to classify cases of accurate delirium diagnosis vs. misdiagnosis.

Results: Thirty five of 74 new cases referred were misdiagnosed. The proposed predictive algorithm achieved a mean Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area under the curve (AUC) of 79%, an average 72% classification accuracy, 77% sensitivity and 67% specificity.

Conclusions: Delirium is commonly misdiagnosed in hospital settings. Our findings support the potential application of Machine Leaning-logistic predictive classifier in health care settings.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tabaie A, Tran A, Calabria T, Bennett S, Milicia A, Weintraub W J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50935.

PMID: 39186764 PMC: 11384169. DOI: 10.2196/50935.


Delirium in psychiatric settings: risk factors and assessment tools in patients with psychiatric illness: a scoping review.

Huang C, Wu B, Chen H, Tao H, Wei Z, Su L BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):464.

PMID: 38977984 PMC: 11229275. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02121-6.


Novel opportunities for clinical pharmacy research: development of a machine learning model to identify medication related causes of delirium in different patient groups.

Weidmann A, Watson E Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(4):992-995.

PMID: 38594470 PMC: 11286716. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01707-z.


Drug Treatment for Patients with Postoperative Delirium and Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study of a Nationwide Hospital Claims Database.

Noda Y, Tarasawa K, Fushimi K, Fujimori K Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2024; 3(4):116-126.

PMID: 38505471 PMC: 10760470. DOI: 10.37737/ace.3.4_116.


Cognitive Computing-Based CDSS in Medical Practice.

Chen J, Lu C, Huang H, Zhu D, Yang Q, Liu J Health Data Sci. 2024; 2021:9819851.

PMID: 38487503 PMC: 10880153. DOI: 10.34133/2021/9819851.


References
1.
Wada T, Wada M, Wada M, Onishi H . Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of misdiagnosed delirium in cancer patients. Palliat Support Care. 2010; 8(2):125-31. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951509990861. View

2.
Caplan J . Don't ask, don't tell: delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(3):1129-30. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819bb88a. View

3.
Kishi Y, Kato M, Okuyama T, Hosaka T, Mikami K, Meller W . Delirium: patient characteristics that predict a missed diagnosis at psychiatric consultation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007; 29(5):442-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.05.006. View

4.
Mittal D, Majithia D, Kennedy R, Rhudy J . Differences in characteristics and outcome of delirium as based on referral patterns. Psychosomatics. 2006; 47(5):367-75. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.47.5.367. View

5.
Ely E, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T . The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 27(12):1892-900. PMC: 7095464. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2. View