» Articles » PMID: 32103915

Frailty Phenotype: Evidence of Both Physical and Mental Health Components in Community-Dwelling Early-Old Adults

Abstract

Background: Demographic aging results in increased incidence of old-age disability. Frailty is a major factor contributing to old-age disability. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the frailty phenotype as defined by Fried et al and to estimate the need for associated preventative interventions in early-old community-dwelling inhabitants of the southern industrial region of Poland, as well as to investigate the defining components of the frailty phenotype.

Methods: The study group consisted of 160 individuals with an average age of 66.8 ± 4.2 years ( ± SD), 71 (44.4%) of study participants were women. The cohort was randomized out of over 843 thousand community-dwelling Upper Silesian inhabitants aged 60-74 years, who agreed to participate in this project. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), frailty phenotype test (as described by Fried et al) blood tests and bioimpedance body structure analysis was completed for study participants. Functional assessment included Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (Barthel Index), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), and Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form (GDS-SF).

Results: Prefrailty was diagnosed in 24.4% of the subjects (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 17.7-31.0%; 31% in women and 19.1% in men, =0.082) and frailty in 2.5% subjects (95% CI 0.1-4.9%; more frequently in women: 4.2% versus 1.1% in men, =0.046). Having one or more positive frailty criteria was positively associated with depression (odds ratio (OR)=2.85, 95% CI=1.08-7.54, =0.035) and negatively associated with MMSE score (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56-0.93, =0.012) and fat-free mass (OR=0.96, 95% CI=0.92-0.99, =0.016) in multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, disease prevalence, number of medications, functional tests (Barthel Index, IADL, MMSE, GDS-SF), BMI, bioimpedance body composition score, and blood tests.

Conclusion: At least 25% of the early-old community-dwelling population would benefit from a frailty prevention program. The frailty phenotype reflects both physical and mental health in this population.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated with Frailty in Older Adults in Community and Nursing Home Settings: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.

Liu J, Zhu Y, Tan J, Ismail A, Ibrahim R, Hassan N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673654 PMC: 11050860. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082382.


The prevalence of mental frailty in ICU survivors and informal caregiver strain: A 1-year retrospective study of the Frisian aftercare cohort.

Beumeler L, Bethlehem C, Hoogstins-Vlagsma T, van Zutphen T, Buter H, Navis G J Intensive Care Soc. 2023; 24(4):356-363.

PMID: 37841292 PMC: 10572478. DOI: 10.1177/17511437221139547.


Influencing factors of care dependence in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention-A cross-sectional study.

Guo J, Chen Y, Dai Y, Chen Q, Wang X Nurs Open. 2022; 10(1):241-251.

PMID: 35997202 PMC: 9748071. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1299.


Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Healthy Aging Adults: Coronary Artery Disease, Lower Educational Status and Higher P-Selectin Levels.

Batko-Szwaczka A, Francuz T, Kosowska A, Cogiel A, Dudzinska-Griszek J, Wilczynski K Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 17:1173-1185.

PMID: 35957925 PMC: 9362850. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S363881.


Impact of Health Literacy on the Progression of Frailty after 4 Years among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Yoshizawa Y, Tanaka T, Takahashi K, Fujisaki-Sueda-Sakai M, Son B, Iijima K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1).

PMID: 35010654 PMC: 8744550. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010394.


References
1.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

2.
MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

3.
Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, Habbig A, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B . Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; 17(12):1163.e1-1163.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010. View

4.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

5.
Manfredi G, Midao L, Paul C, Cena C, Duarte M, Costa E . Prevalence of frailty status among the European elderly population: Findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019; 19(8):723-729. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13689. View