» Articles » PMID: 32102829

The Short Fiber Mutation Is Located Within a Terminal Deletion of Chromosome 18 in Cotton

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2020 Feb 28
PMID 32102829
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extreme elongation distinguishes about one-fourth of cotton ( sp.) seed epidermal cells as "lint" fibers, useful for the textile industry, from "fuzz" fibers (<5 mm). ( ), a dominant mutation that results in no lint fiber but normal fuzz fiber, offers insight into pathways and mechanisms that differentiate spinnable cotton from its progenitors. A genetic map developed using 1,545 F2 plants showed that marker CISP15 was 0.4 cM from , and "dominant" simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (i.e. with null alleles in the genotype) SSR7 and SSR18 showed complete linkage with Nonrandom distribution of markers with null alleles suggests that the phenotype results from a 176- to 221-kb deletion of the terminal region of chromosome 18 that may have been masked in prior pooled-sample mapping strategies. The deletion includes 10 genes with putative roles in fiber development. Two Glycosyltransferase Family 1 genes showed striking expression differences during elongation of wild-type versus fiber, and virus-induced silencing of these genes in the wild type induced like phenotypes. Further, at least 7 of the 10 putative fiber development genes in the deletion region showed higher expression in the wild type than in mutants during fiber development stages, suggesting coordinated regulation of processes in cell wall development and cell elongation, consistent with the hypothesis that some fiber-related quantitative trait loci comprise closely spaced groups of functionally diverse but coordinately regulated genes.

Citing Articles

Exploring the plasmodesmata callose-binding protein gene family in upland cotton: unraveling insights for enhancing fiber length.

Zhang H, Xiao X, Li Z, Chen Y, Li P, Peng R PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17625.

PMID: 38948221 PMC: 11214431. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17625.


Systematically and Comprehensively Understanding the Regulation of Cotton Fiber Initiation: A Review.

Zhai Z, Zhang K, Fang Y, Yang Y, Cao X, Liu L Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37960127 PMC: 10648247. DOI: 10.3390/plants12213771.


Comparative transcriptional and co-expression network analysis of two upland cotton accessions with extreme phenotypic differences reveals molecular mechanisms of fiber development.

He J, Xu Z, Azhar M, Zhang Z, Li P, Gong J Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1189490.

PMID: 37719229 PMC: 10502173. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1189490.


Phenomics and transcriptomics analyses reveal deposition of suberin and lignin in the short fiber cell walls produced from a wild cotton species and two mutants.

Kim H, Liu Y, Thyssen G, Naoumkina M, Frelichowski J PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282799.

PMID: 36893139 PMC: 9997941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282799.


A deletion/duplication in the Ligon lintless-2 locus induces siRNAs that inhibit cotton fiber cell elongation.

Naoumkina M, Thyssen G, Fang D, Florane C, Li P Plant Physiol. 2022; 190(3):1792-1805.

PMID: 35997586 PMC: 9614481. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac384.


References
1.
Paterson A, Freeling M, Tang H, Wang X . Insights from the comparison of plant genome sequences. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61:349-72. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112235. View

2.
Lin Z, Li X, Shannon L, Yeh C, L Wang M, Bai G . Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(6):720-4. PMC: 3532051. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2281. View

3.
Chekanova J . Long non-coding RNAs and their functions in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015; 27:207-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.08.003. View

4.
Hovav R, Udall J, Chaudhary B, Hovav E, Flagel L, Hu G . The evolution of spinnable cotton fiber entailed prolonged development and a novel metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4(2):e25. PMC: 2222923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040025. View

5.
Li F, Fan G, Wang K, Sun F, Yuan Y, Song G . Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(6):567-72. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2987. View