» Articles » PMID: 32101603

Prognosis for Patients with Cognitive Motor Dissociation Identified by Brain-computer Interface

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Feb 27
PMID 32101603
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cognitive motor dissociation describes a subset of patients with disorders of consciousness who show neuroimaging evidence of consciousness but no detectable command-following behaviours. Although essential for family counselling, decision-making, and the design of rehabilitation programmes, the prognosis for patients with cognitive motor dissociation remains under-investigated. The current study included 78 patients with disorders of consciousness who showed no detectable command-following behaviours. These patients included 45 patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and 33 patients in a minimally conscious state, as diagnosed using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Each patient underwent an EEG-based brain-computer interface experiment, in which he or she was instructed to perform an item-selection task (i.e. select a photograph or a number from two candidates). Patients who achieved statistically significant brain-computer interface accuracies were identified as cognitive motor dissociation. Two evaluations using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, one before the experiment and the other 3 months later, were carried out to measure the patients' behavioural improvements. Among the 78 patients with disorders of consciousness, our results showed that within the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patient group, 15 of 18 patients with cognitive motor dissociation (83.33%) regained consciousness, while only five of the other 27 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients without significant brain-computer interface accuracies (18.52%) regained consciousness. Furthermore, within the minimally conscious state patient group, 14 of 16 patients with cognitive motor dissociation (87.5%) showed improvements in their Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores, whereas only four of the other 17 minimally conscious state patients without significant brain-computer interface accuracies (23.53%) had improved Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores. Our results suggest that patients with cognitive motor dissociation have a better outcome than other patients. Our findings extend current knowledge of the prognosis for patients with cognitive motor dissociation and have important implications for brain-computer interface-based clinical diagnosis and prognosis for patients with disorders of consciousness.

Citing Articles

Reconstructing Covert Consciousness: Neural Decoding as a Novel Consciousness Assessment.

Fischer D, Edlow B, Freeman H, Alaiev D, Wu Q, Ware J Neurology. 2025; 104(4):e210208.

PMID: 39883908 PMC: 11781786. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210208.


Revolutionizing treatment for disorders of consciousness: a multidisciplinary review of advancements in deep brain stimulation.

Yang Y, Cao T, He S, Wang L, He Q, Fan L Mil Med Res. 2024; 11(1):81.

PMID: 39690407 PMC: 11654023. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00585-w.


CTNet: a convolutional transformer network for EEG-based motor imagery classification.

Zhao W, Jiang X, Zhang B, Xiao S, Weng S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20237.

PMID: 39215126 PMC: 11364810. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71118-7.


Prognosis of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness after brain injury: a longitudinal cohort study.

Yan D, Simei L, Hongzhao B, Hongyan D, Yuchao D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1421779.

PMID: 39114510 PMC: 11303146. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421779.


Review of Performance Improvement of a Noninvasive Brain-computer Interface in Communication and Motor Control for Clinical Applications.

Saito Y, Kamagata K, Akashi T, Wada A, Shimoji K, Hori M Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2024; 69(4):319-326.

PMID: 38846633 PMC: 10984355. DOI: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ23-0011-R.


References
1.
Giacino J, Fins J, Laureys S, Schiff N . Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10(2):99-114. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279. View

2.
Curley W, Forgacs P, Voss H, Conte M, Schiff N . Characterization of EEG signals revealing covert cognition in the injured brain. Brain. 2018; 141(5):1404-1421. PMC: 5917770. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy070. View

3.
Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z, Duncan N, Tang W, Wolff A . How are different neural networks related to consciousness?. Ann Neurol. 2015; 78(4):594-605. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24479. View

4.
Pan J, Li Y, Zhang R, Gu Z, Li F . Discrimination between control and idle states in asynchronous SSVEP-based brain switches: a pseudo-key-based approach. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013; 21(3):435-43. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2253801. View

5.
Treder M, Schmidt N, Blankertz B . Gaze-independent brain-computer interfaces based on covert attention and feature attention. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8(6):066003. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/066003. View