Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Discharge Videoconference for Children with Medical Complexity: a Pilot Study
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The hospital to home transition for children with medical complexity (CMC) poses many challenges, including suboptimal communication between the hospital and medical home. Our objective was to evaluate the implementation of a discharge videoconference incorporating the patient, caregiver, primary care provider (PCP), hospitalist physician, and case manager.
Methods: We evaluated implementation of this pilot intervention at a freestanding tertiary care children's hospital using mixed methods. A discharge videoconference was conducted for hospitalized children (< 18 years old) meeting complex chronic disease (C-CD) criteria. We collected field notes and conducted surveys and semi-structured interviews. Outcomes included adoption, cost, acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Adoption, cost, and acceptability were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness were summarized using thematic content analysis.
Results: : A total of 4 CMC (9% of the 44 eligible children) had discharge videoconferences conducted. (): On average, videoconferences took 5 min to schedule and lasted 21.5 min. : All hospitalists involved ( = 4) were very likely to participate again. Interviews with caregivers ( = 4) and PCPs ( = 5) demonstrated that for those participating, videoconferences were acceptable and appropriate due to benefits including development of a shared understanding, remote physical assessment by the PCP, transparency, and humanization of the care handoff, and increased PCP comfort with care of CMC. Barriers included internet connection quality and scheduling constraints.
Conclusions: This novel, visual approach to discharge communication for CMC had low adoption, possibly related to recruitment strategy. The videoconference posed low time burdens, and participating physicians and caregivers found them acceptable due to a variety of benefits. We identified several feasibility barriers that could be targeted in future implementation efforts.
Bernuzzi C, Piccardo M, Marsilio M, Calcaterra V, Zuccotti G, Guglielmetti C J Healthc Leadersh. 2024; 16:485-500.
PMID: 39563714 PMC: 11574288. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S467155.
Caring for children with new medical technology at home: parental perspectives.
Pitch N, Shahil A, Mekhuri S, Ambreen M, Chu S, Keilty K BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023; 7(1).
PMID: 37865398 PMC: 10603509. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002062.
Asan O, Elkefi S, Clouser K, Percy S Front Digit Health. 2023; 4:992838.
PMID: 36620184 PMC: 9816337. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.992838.
Telemedicine across the continuum of neonatal-perinatal care.
Chuo J, Makkar A, Machut K, Zenge J, Jagarapu J, Azzuqa A Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 27(5):101398.
PMID: 36333212 PMC: 9623499. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2022.101398.
Six practical recommendations for improved implementation outcomes reporting.
Lengnick-Hall R, Gerke D, Proctor E, Bunger A, Phillips R, Martin J Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1):16.
PMID: 35135566 PMC: 8822722. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01183-3.