» Articles » PMID: 32095283

Photoacoustic Tomography with a Ring Ultrasound Transducer: A Comparison of Different Illumination Strategies

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 26
PMID 32095283
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a methodology that uses the absorption of short laser pulses by endogenous or exogenous chromophores within human tissue, and the subsequent generation of acoustic waves acquired by an ultrasound (US) transducer, to form an image that can provide functional and molecular information. Amongst the various types of PA imaging, PA tomography (PAT) has been proposed for imaging pathologies such as breast cancer. However, the main challenge for PAT imaging is the deliverance of sufficient light energy horizontally through an imaging cross-section as well as vertically. In this study, three different illumination methods are compared for a full-ring ultrasound (US) PAT system. The three distinct illumination setups are full-ring, diffused-beam, and point source illumination. The full-ring system utilizes a cone mirror and parabolic reflector to create the ringed-shaped beam for PAT, while the diffuse scheme uses a light diffuser to expand the beam, which illuminates tissue-mimicking phantoms. The results indicate that the full-ring illumination is capable of providing a more uniform fluence irrespective of the vertical depth of the imaged cross-section, while the point source and diffused illumination methods provide a higher fluence at regions closer to the point of entry, which diminishes with depth. In addition, a set of experiments was conducted to determine the optimum position of ring-illumination with respect to the position of the acoustic detectors to achieve the highest signal-to-noise ratio.

Citing Articles

Niche preclinical and clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging with endogenous contrast.

John S, Hester S, Basij M, Paul A, Xavierselvan M, Mehrmohammadi M Photoacoustics. 2023; 32:100533.

PMID: 37636547 PMC: 10448345. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100533.


Wavelength-dependent error minimization for quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography with a ring-array system.

Pattyn A, Yan Y, Mehrmohammadi M Z Med Phys. 2023; 33(3):444-451.

PMID: 37225605 PMC: 10517392. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.005.


Recent Advances in Flexible Ultrasonic Transducers: From Materials Optimization to Imaging Applications.

Ren D, Yin Y, Li C, Chen R, Shi J Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36677187 PMC: 9866268. DOI: 10.3390/mi14010126.


Dual-Wavelength Photoacoustic Computed Tomography with Piezoelectric Ring-Array Transducer for Imaging of Indocyanine Green Liposomes Aggregation in Tumors.

Sun X, Shan H, Lin Q, Chen Z, Liu D, Liu Z Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(6).

PMID: 35744560 PMC: 9227349. DOI: 10.3390/mi13060946.


Endocavity ultrasound and photoacoustic system for fetal and maternal imaging: design, implementation, and validation.

Yan Y, Hernandez-Andrade E, Basij M, Alshahrani S, Kondle S, Brown B J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021; 8(6):066001.

PMID: 34778491 PMC: 8577694. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.6.066001.


References
1.
Tamimi R, Byrne C, Colditz G, Hankinson S . Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(15):1178-87. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm062. View

2.
Lin L, Hu P, Shi J, Appleton C, Maslov K, Li L . Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):2352. PMC: 6003984. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z. View

3.
Kruger R, Kuzmiak C, Lam R, Reinecke D, Del Rio S, Steed D . Dedicated 3D photoacoustic breast imaging. Med Phys. 2013; 40(11):113301. PMC: 3808420. DOI: 10.1118/1.4824317. View

4.
Arendt Jensen J . Medical ultrasound imaging. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006; 93(1-3):153-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.025. View

5.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(1):7-34. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21551. View