» Articles » PMID: 32093543

Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Feb 26
PMID 32093543
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Studies suggest lateral wall (LW) scala tympani (ST) height decreases apically, which may limit insertion depth. No studies have investigated the relationship of LW ST height with translocation rate or location.

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Cochlear implant program at tertiary referral center.

Subjects And Methods: LW ST height was measured in preoperative images for patients with straight electrodes. Scalar location, angle of insertion depth (AID), and translocation depth were measured in postoperative images. Audiologic outcomes were tracked.

Results: In total, 177 ears were identified with 39 translocations (22%). Median AID was 443° (interquartile range [IQR], 367°-550°). Audiologic outcomes (126 ears) showed a small, significant correlation between consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score and AID ( = 0.20, = .027), although correlation was insignificant if translocation occurred ( = 0.11, = .553). Translocation did not affect CNC score ( = .335). AID was higher for translocated electrodes (503° vs 445°, = .004). Median translocation depth was 381° (IQR, 222°-399°). Median depth at which a 0.5-mm electrode would not fit within 0.1 mm of LW was 585° (IQR, 405°-585°). Median depth at which a 0.5-mm electrode would displace the basilar membrane by ≥0.1 mm was 585° (IQR, 518°-765°); this was defined as predicted translocation depth (PTD). Translocation rate was 39% for insertions deeper than PTD and 14% for insertions shallower than PTD ( = .008).

Conclusion: AID and CNC are directly correlated for straight electrodes when not translocated. Translocations generally occur around 380° and are more common with deeper insertions due to decreasing LW ST height. Risk of translocation increases significantly after 580°.

Citing Articles

The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Berg K, Goldsworthy R, Noble J, Dawant B, Gifford R J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(6):4289-4302.

PMID: 39740049 PMC: 11693204. DOI: 10.1121/10.0034603.


Electrode array positioning after cochlear reimplantation from single manufacturer.

Smetak M, Fernando S, OMalley M, Bennett M, Haynes D, Wootten C Cochlear Implants Int. 2023; 24(5):273-281.

PMID: 37489512 PMC: 10372339. DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2023.2179756.


Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection.

Thomas J, Klein H, Haubitz I, Dazert S, Volter C J Pers Med. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37109019 PMC: 10142378. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040633.


[Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background].

Weber L, Kwok P, Picou E, Wendl C, Bohr C, Marcrum S HNO. 2022; 70(10):769-777.

PMID: 35970933 PMC: 9512738. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01208-3.


Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner W Front Surg. 2022; 9:823219.

PMID: 35402479 PMC: 8987358. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219.


References
1.
Spahr A, Dorman M, Litvak L, Van Wie S, Gifford R, Loizou P . Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear. 2011; 33(1):112-7. PMC: 4643855. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549. View

2.
Zhao Y, Dawant B, Labadie R, Noble J . Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014; 17(Pt 1):331-8. PMC: 4426961. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_42. View

3.
Noble J, Gifford R, Labadie R, Dawant B . Statistical shape model segmentation and frequency mapping of cochlear implant stimulation targets in CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013; 15(Pt 2):421-8. PMC: 3559125. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_52. View

4.
Noble J, Dawant B . Automatic graph-based localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2016; 9350:152-159. PMC: 4854292. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_19. View

5.
Hatsushika S, Shepherd R, Tong Y, Clark G, Funasaka S . Dimensions of the scala tympani in the human and cat with reference to cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990; 99(11):871-6. DOI: 10.1177/000348949009901104. View