» Articles » PMID: 32092607

Dissatisfaction of Women with Induction of Labour According to Parity: Results of a Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Midwifery
Date 2020 Feb 25
PMID 32092607
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the factors associated with dissatisfaction in women whose labour was induced, according to parity.

Design: Prospective population-based cohort study.

Setting: Seven French perinatal health networks including 94 maternity units PARTICIPANTS: Among 3042 consecutive women who underwent induction of labour (IoL) with a live foetus from November 17 to December 20, 2015, in participating maternity units, this study included the 1453 who answered the self-administered questionnaire about their experience of IoL at two months post-delivery.

Measurements: The associations between women's dissatisfaction at two months post-delivery and the characteristics of their pregnancy, labour, and delivery were assessed with multivariable logistic regression models. Analyses were stratified for nulliparous and parous women. Multivariable mixed models were used to take a random effect for the maternity unit into account.

Findings: The response rate was 47.8% (n = 1453/3042). Overall, 30% of the nulliparous women were dissatisfied (n = 231/770) and 19.7% (n = 130/659) of the parous women. The specific independent determinants of dissatisfaction for nulliparous women were antenatal birth classes that failed to include discussion of IoL (OR: 2.68, 95% CI [1.37; 5.23]) and lack of involvement in the decision-making process (OR: 1.92, 95% CI [1.23; 3.02]). For the parous women, a specific determinant was a delivery that lasted more than 24 h (OR: 4.04, 95% CI [1.78; 9.14]). Determinants of maternal dissatisfaction common to both groups were unbearable vaginal discomfort (respectively, OR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.16; 3.37] and OR: 4.23, 95% CI [2.04; 8.77]), inadequate pain relief (respectively, OR: 5.55, 95% CI [3.48; 8.86] and OR: 9.17, 95% CI [5.24; 16.02]), lack of attention to requests (respectively OR: 3.81, 95% CI [2.35; 6.19] and OR: 5.01, 95% CI [2.38; 10.52]), caesarean delivery (respectively, OR: 5.55, 95% CI [3.41; 9.03] and OR: 4.61, 95% CI [2.02; 10.53]) and severe maternal complications (respectively, OR: 2.45, 95% CI [1.02; 5.88] and OR: 5.29, 95% CI [1.32; 21.21]).

Key Conclusions And Implications For Practice: To reduce dissatisfaction in nulliparous women, IoL should be discussed during antenatal birth classes and women should be made to feel that they shared in the medical decision to perform IoL. For parous women, care providers should inform them that the duration of delivery may exceed 24 h. Continuous support for all women during IoL should pay closer attention to vaginal discomfort, pain and women's requests. Postpartum discussions with mothers should be arranged to enable conversation about the experience of unexpected events.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of methods of preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor in Poland and in Germany (Part II): maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Kleszcz A, Cwiek D, Sipak-Szmigiel O BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):72.

PMID: 39871179 PMC: 11770951. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07015-8.


Uncharted territory: a narrative review of parental involvement in decision-making about late preterm and early term delivery.

Mielewczyk F, Boyle E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):526.

PMID: 37464284 PMC: 10354979. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05845-6.


Women's subjective perceptions and background factors associated with poor maternal childbirth experience among induced and spontaneous onset of labour: a two-year tertiary hospital cohort study.

Place K, Rahkonen L, Adler K, Kruit H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):349.

PMID: 37179323 PMC: 10182675. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05665-8.


Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain relief and birth experience among induced and spontaneous-onset labours ending in vaginal birth: A prospective cohort study.

Makela K, Palomaki O, Korpiharju H, Helminen M, Uotila J Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023; 18:100185.

PMID: 37035413 PMC: 10073637. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100185.


Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the EXIT to Measure Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor.

Guiguet-Auclair C, Rouzaire M, Debost-Legrand A, Dissard S, Rouille M, Delabaere A J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35887980 PMC: 9317795. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144217.