» Articles » PMID: 32092551

Is It Time? Episodic Imagining and the Discounting of Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards in Young and Older Adults

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Feb 25
PMID 32092551
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remembering and imagining specific, personal experiences can help shape our decisions. For example, cues to imagine future events can reduce delay discounting (i.e., increase the subjective value of future rewards). It is not known, however, whether such cues can also modulate other forms of reward discounting, such as probability discounting (i.e., the decrease in the subjective value of a possible reward as the odds against its occurrence increase). In addition, it is unclear whether there are age-related differences in the effects of cueing on either delay or probability discounting. Accordingly, young and older adult participants were administered delay and probability discounting tasks both with and without cues to imagine specific, personally meaningful events. As expected, cued episodic imagining decreased the discounting of delayed rewards. Notably, however, this effect was significantly less pronounced in older adults. In contrast to the effects of cueing on delay discounting, personally relevant event cues had little or no effect on the discounting of probabilistic rewards in either young or older adults; Bayesian analysis revealed compelling support for the null hypothesis that event cues do not modulate the subjective value of probabilistic rewards. In sum, imagining future events appears only to affect decisions involving delayed rewards. Although the cueing effect is smaller in older adults, nevertheless, it likely contributes to how adults of all ages evaluate delayed rewards and thus, it is, in fact, about time.

Citing Articles

Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.

Halilova J, Fynes-Clinton S, Terao C, Addis D, Rosenbaum R Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025; 10(1):1.

PMID: 39847192 PMC: 11757841. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00609-y.


Predictors of Change in Vaccination Decisions Among the Vaccine Hesitant: Examining the Roles of Age and Intolerance of Uncertainty.

Halilova J, Fynes-Clinton S, Addis D, Rosenbaum R Ann Behav Med. 2024; 58(11):768-777.

PMID: 39269193 PMC: 11487580. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae053.


Assessing the relationship between delay discounting and decisions to engage in various protective behaviors during COVID-19.

Halilova J, Fynes-Clinton S, Addis D, Rosenbaum R Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):38.

PMID: 38886253 PMC: 11183030. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00566-6.


Positive autobiographical memory recall does not influence temporal discounting: an internal meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Lempert K, Parthasarathi T, Linhares S, Ruh N, Kable J J Econ Psychol. 2024; 103.

PMID: 38799018 PMC: 11113695. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102730.


Imagining the future can shape the present: A systematic review of the impact of episodic future thinking on substance use outcomes.

Collado A, Stokes A Psychol Addict Behav. 2023; 38(1):134-152.

PMID: 37307365 PMC: 10713863. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000933.


References
1.
Addis D, Wong A, Schacter D . Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(1):33-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x. View

2.
MacKillop J, Weafer J, Gray J, Oshri A, Palmer A, de Wit H . The latent structure of impulsivity: impulsive choice, impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016; 233(18):3361-70. PMC: 5204128. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4372-0. View

3.
Seaman K, Brooks N, Karrer T, Castrellon J, Perkins S, Dang L . Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018; 13(5):449-459. PMC: 6007391. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy021. View

4.
Gaesser B, Sacchetti D, Addis D, Schacter D . Characterizing age-related changes in remembering the past and imagining the future. Psychol Aging. 2010; 26(1):80-4. PMC: 3062729. DOI: 10.1037/a0021054. View

5.
Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P . Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999; 25(2):418-27. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.418. View