» Articles » PMID: 32086774

Applying a Health Equity Tool to Assess a Public Health Nursing Guideline for Practice in Sexually Transmitted Infection Assessment in British Columbia

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Feb 23
PMID 32086774
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Setting: There is a multitude of health equity tools but little guidance on how to effectively use these tools in public health nursing practice. In BC, public health nurses who are certified in sexually transmitted infection care utilize guidelines authorized by the nursing regulatory body.

Intervention: As part of the Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH) research project, an assessment of the nursing guideline, Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Assessment Decision Support Tool, was undertaken using the Assessing Equity in Clinical Practice Guidelines health equity assessment tool. The chosen tool is intended for use by health care providers, is broadly applicable to clinical practice guidelines, can be used retrospectively, and falls within the category of equity checklists and audits.

Outcomes: Overall, the tool was useful in assessing the inclusion and omission of an equity focus in the guideline. However, there were several challenges: the identification of an appropriate health equity tool; the absence of an evaluation of the chosen tool; the tool's focus on chronic disease versus communicable disease; and the difficulty of obtaining client perspectives.

Implications: For an improved equity lens in the STI Assessment Decision Support Tool, future revisions should be equity focused and include perspectives from affected populations, an emphasis on the determinants of health that perpetuate inequities for populations who experience a disproportionate burden of STI, information on provincially available resources, and service delivery models that improve timely and equitable access to treatment and care.

Citing Articles

Health equity considerations in guideline development: a rapid scoping review.

Shaver N, Bennett A, Beck A, Skidmore B, Traversy G, Brouwers M CMAJ Open. 2023; 11(2):E357-E371.

PMID: 37171906 PMC: 10139082. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220130.

References
1.
Rose G . Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30(3):427-32; discussion 433-4. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.3.427. View

2.
Shoveller J, Johnson J, Rosenberg M, Greaves L, Patrick D, Oliffe J . Youth's experiences with STI testing in four communities in British Columbia, Canada. Sex Transm Infect. 2009; 85(5):397-401. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2008.035568. View

3.
Sadana R, Blas E . What can public health programs do to improve health equity?. Public Health Rep. 2013; 128 Suppl 3:12-20. PMC: 3945444. DOI: 10.1177/00333549131286S303. View

4.
Masaro C, Johnson J, Chabot C, Shoveller J . STI service delivery in British Columbia, Canada; providers' views of their services to youth. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:240. PMC: 3469370. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-240. View

5.
Pugsley R, Chapman D, Kennedy M, Liu H, Lapane K . Residential segregation and gonorrhea rates in US metropolitan statistical areas, 2005-2009. Sex Transm Dis. 2013; 40(6):439-43. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31828c6416. View